The expected polygenic risk score (ePRS) framework: an equitable metric for quantifying polygenetic risk via modeling of ancestral makeup
Huang, Y.-J.; Kurniansyah, N.; Goodman, M. O.; Spitzer, B. W.; Wang, J.; Stilp, A. M.; Laurie, C.; de Vries, P. S.; Chen, H.; Min, Y.-I.; Sims, M.; Peloso, G. M.; Guo, X.; Bis, J. C.; Brody, J. A.; Raffield, L. M.; Smith, J. A.; Zhao, W.; Rotter, J. I.; Rich, S. S.; Redline, S.; Fornage, M.; Kaplan, R.; Franceschini, N.; Levy, D.; Morrison, A. C.; Boerwinkle, E.; Smith, N. L.; Kooperberg, C.; Psaty, B. M.; Zoellner, S.; Sofer, T.
Show abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) depend on genetic ancestry due to differences in allele frequencies between ancestral populations. This leads to implementation challenges in diverse populations. We propose a framework to calibrate PRS based on ancestral makeup. We define a metric called "expected PRS" (ePRS), the expected value of a PRS based on ones global or local admixture patterns. We further define the "residual PRS" (rPRS), measuring the deviation of the PRS from the ePRS. Simulation studies confirm that it suffices to adjust for ePRS to obtain nearly unbiased estimates of the PRS-outcome association without further adjusting for PCs. Using the TOPMed dataset, the estimated effect size of the rPRS adjusting for the ePRS is similar to the estimated effect of the PRS adjusting for genetic PCs. Similarly, we applied the ePRS framework to six cardiovascular-related traits in the All of Us dataset, and the results are consistent with those from the TOPMed analysis. The ePRS framework can protect from population stratification in association analysis and provide an equitable strategy to quantify genetic risk across diverse populations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adjusting for principal components can induce spurious associations in genome-wide association studies in admixed populations 97%
- Joint Modeling of Effect Sizes for Two Correlated Traits: Characterizing Trait Properties to Enhance Polygenic Risk Prediction 96%
- Identifying Causal Variants by Fine Mapping Across Multiple Studies 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- BinomiRare: A carriers-only test for association of rare genetic variants with a binary outcome for mixed models and any case-control proportion 96%
- A parametric bootstrap approach for computing confidence intervals for genetic correlations with application to genetically-determined protein-protein networks 95%
- Identifying and correcting for misspecifications in GWAS summary statistics and polygenic scores 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identity-by-descent mapping using multi-individual IBD with genome-wide multiple testing adjustment 97%
- Taking population stratification into account by local permutations in rare-variant association studies on small samples 96%
- GxE PRS: Genotype-environment interaction in polygenic risk score models for quantitative and binary traits 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Summary statistics from large-scale gene-environment interaction studies for re-analysis and meta-analysis 95%
- The predictive capacity of polygenic risk scores for disease risk is only moderately influenced by imputation panels tailored to the target population 95%
- Subset scanning for multi-trait analysis using GWAS summary statistics 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.