Back

Increased Risk of Cirrhosis in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Danish registry-based cohort study (1998-2018)

Deepak, P.; McHenry, S.; Karachalia Sandri, A.; Brusco De Freitas, M.; Zamani, M.; Yarur, A. J.; Jess, T.

2024-03-06 gastroenterology
10.1101/2024.03.05.24303668 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsPrior studies suggest an increased risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to investigate the risk of cirrhosis in a nationwide cohort of IBD patients compared to a matched non-IBD population. MethodsPatients diagnosed with IBD without prior cirrhosis during 1998-2018 were identified in the Danish health registries and were matched 1:10 to persons without IBD. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsWithin the study population of 495,220 persons, a total of 2,741 cirrhosis cases were identified during follow-up, with a higher proportion of cases among patients with IBD (0.9%) compared to non-IBD persons (0.5%). Patients with IBD had a significantly higher risk of cirrhosis compared to non-IBD persons (adjusted HR (aHR) (95% CI): 1.84 (1.64-2.04)). The leading etiology of cirrhosis in IBD was NAFLD (51.6%), followed by alcohol (39.0%). The risk of cirrhosis among IBD patients (compared to non-IBD persons) was more pronounced among those diagnosed with IBD [&le;] 40 years of age (aHR (95% CI): 3.08 (2.45-3.87); vs. > 40 years of age, 1.63 (1.45-1.84); p-value <0.001) and CD patients (aHR (95% CI): 2.20 (1.80-2.67); vs. 1.72 (1.52-1.95) among UC; p-value 0.04). ConclusionIBD was associated with an increased risk of incident cirrhosis, especially in patients aged [&le;] 40 years at IBD diagnosis and in patients with CD. These findings point towards a need for focused screening for cirrhosis among IBD patients, especially in certain groups.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.