Shared Medical Appointments in Heart Failure For Post-hospitalization Follow-up: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Taveira, T. H.; Cohen, L. B.; LaForest, S.; Oliver, K.; Parent, M.; Hearns, R.; Ball, S.; dev, s.; Wu, W.-C.
Show abstract
BackgroundShared medical appointments (SMAs) in heart failure (HF) are medical visits where several patients with HF meet with multidisciplinary providers at the same time for efficient and comprehensive care. It is unknown whether HF-SMAs can improve overall and cardiac health status for high-risk patients discharged with HF. MethodsA 3-site, open-label, randomized-controlled-trial was conducted. Participants within 12 weeks of HF hospitalization were randomized to receive either HF-SMA or usual HF clinical care (usual-care) on a 1:1 ratio. The HF-SMA team, which consisted of a nurse, nutritionist, psychologist, nurse practitioner and/or a clinical pharmacist, provided four 2-hour session HF-SMAs that met every other week for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were the overall health status measured by EQ5D-VAS and cardiac health status by KCCQ, 180 days post-randomization. ResultsOf the 242 patients enrolled (HF-SMA n=117, usual-care n=125, mean age 69.3{+/-}9.4 years, 71.5% white, 94.6% male), 84% of participants completed the study (n=8 HF-SMA and n=9 usual-care patients died). After 180 days, both HF-SMA and usual-care participants had similar and significant improvements from baseline in KCCQ, but only HF-SMA participants had significant improvements in EQ5D-VAS (mean change = 7.2 {+/-} 15.8 in HF-SMA versus -0.4 {+/-} 19.0 points in usual-care, p<0.001). ConclusionBoth HF-SMA and usual care in HF participants achieved significant improvements in cardiac health status, but only a team approach through HF-SMA achieved significant improvements in overall health status. A larger population and a longer follow-up time are needed in future studies to evaluate re-hospitalization and death outcomes. Clinical PerspectiveO_LIThis randomized controlled trial represents the first multi-site study to rigorously assess the outcomes of a multidisciplinary team intervention in a group medical clinic setting to improve patient-centered self-reported outcomes of high-risk patients with a recent heart failure hospitalization. C_LIO_LIShared medical appointments can improve cardiac specific and overall health status in high-risk patients with heart failure. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- External validation of a claims-based model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction class in patients with heart failure 96%
- Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) 95%
- COVID-19 Infections and Outcomes in a Live Registry of Heart Failure Patients Across an Integrated Health Care System 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rationale and design of the Learning Implementation of Guideline-based decision support system for Hypertension Treatment (LIGHT) Trial and LIGHT-ACD Trial 91%
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 90%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): Protocol of a cluster randomised controlled equivalence trial of prescribing policy to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 95%
- High Variability of Body Mass Index Independently Associated with Incident Heart Failure 94%
- The Role of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Managing Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Apple Watch and Withings Evaluation of Symptoms, Treatment, and Rhythm in those Undergoing Cardioversion (AWE STRUCk): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 91%
- HEART rate variability biofeedback for LOng Covid symptoms (HEARTLOC): protocol for a feasibility study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of the medical therapy with beta-blockers or inhibitors of renin-angiotensin system with clinical outcomes in patients with mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction 94%
- Reflux Esophagitis is Associated with Higher Risks of Acute Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attacks in Patients Hospitalized with Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis 88%
- Decreased door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction during the early COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea – an observational study 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.