Back

Shared Medical Appointments in Heart Failure For Post-hospitalization Follow-up: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Taveira, T. H.; Cohen, L. B.; LaForest, S.; Oliver, K.; Parent, M.; Hearns, R.; Ball, S.; dev, s.; Wu, W.-C.

2024-03-07 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2024.03.04.24303754 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundShared medical appointments (SMAs) in heart failure (HF) are medical visits where several patients with HF meet with multidisciplinary providers at the same time for efficient and comprehensive care. It is unknown whether HF-SMAs can improve overall and cardiac health status for high-risk patients discharged with HF. MethodsA 3-site, open-label, randomized-controlled-trial was conducted. Participants within 12 weeks of HF hospitalization were randomized to receive either HF-SMA or usual HF clinical care (usual-care) on a 1:1 ratio. The HF-SMA team, which consisted of a nurse, nutritionist, psychologist, nurse practitioner and/or a clinical pharmacist, provided four 2-hour session HF-SMAs that met every other week for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes were the overall health status measured by EQ5D-VAS and cardiac health status by KCCQ, 180 days post-randomization. ResultsOf the 242 patients enrolled (HF-SMA n=117, usual-care n=125, mean age 69.3{+/-}9.4 years, 71.5% white, 94.6% male), 84% of participants completed the study (n=8 HF-SMA and n=9 usual-care patients died). After 180 days, both HF-SMA and usual-care participants had similar and significant improvements from baseline in KCCQ, but only HF-SMA participants had significant improvements in EQ5D-VAS (mean change = 7.2 {+/-} 15.8 in HF-SMA versus -0.4 {+/-} 19.0 points in usual-care, p<0.001). ConclusionBoth HF-SMA and usual care in HF participants achieved significant improvements in cardiac health status, but only a team approach through HF-SMA achieved significant improvements in overall health status. A larger population and a longer follow-up time are needed in future studies to evaluate re-hospitalization and death outcomes. Clinical PerspectiveO_LIThis randomized controlled trial represents the first multi-site study to rigorously assess the outcomes of a multidisciplinary team intervention in a group medical clinic setting to improve patient-centered self-reported outcomes of high-risk patients with a recent heart failure hospitalization. C_LIO_LIShared medical appointments can improve cardiac specific and overall health status in high-risk patients with heart failure. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.