Back

Causal Brain Network Evaluates Surgical Outcomes in Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Wang, Y.; Lin, W.; Liu, M.

2024-03-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.03.03.583165 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Network neuroscience has greatly facilitated epilepsy studies; meanwhile, drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is increasingly recognized as a brain network disorder. Unfortunately, surgical success rates in patients with DRE are still very limited, varying 30% [~] 70%. At present, there is almost no systematic exploration of intracranial electrophysiological brain network closely related to surgical outcomes, and it is not clear which brain network methodologies can effectively promote DRE precision medicine. In this retrospective comparative study, we included multicenter datasets, containing electrocorticogram (ECoG) data from 17 DRE patients with 55 seizures. Ictal ECoG within clinically-annotated epileptogenic zone (EZ) and non-epileptogenic zone (NEZ) were separately computed using six different algorithms to construct causal brain networks. All the brain network results were divided into two groups, successful and failed surgery. Statistical results based on the Mann-Whitney-U-test show that: causal connectivity of -frequency band (8 [~] 13 Hz) in EZ calculated by convergent cross mapping (CCM) gains the most significant differences between the surgical success and failure groups, with a P value of 7.85e-08 and Cohens d effect size of 0.77. CCM-defined EZ brain network can also distinguish the successful and failed surgeries considering clinical covariates (clinical centers, DRE types) with P < 0. 001. Based on the brain network features, machine learning models are established to predict the surgical outcomes. Among them, SVM classifier with Gaussian kernel function and Bayesian Optimization demonstrates the highest average accuracy of 84.48% through 5-fold cross validation, further indicating that the CCM-defined EZ brain network is a reliable biomarker for predicting DREs surgical outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.