Back

Chrom-pro: A User-Friendly Toolkit for De-novo Chromosome Assembly and Genomic Analysis

Song, W.; Ye, T.; Liu, S.; Shen, D.; Du, Y.; Yang, Y.; Lu, Y.; Jin, H.; huo, y.; Piao, W.; Jin, H.

2024-03-05 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.03.02.583079 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chromosome-level genome assembly is fundamental to current genomic and post-genomic research, however, the process remains complicated and challenging due to the lack of a standardized automatic workflow. The frequently-used method for high-quality genome assembly generally employs second-generation sequencing (SGS) low error reads, third-generation sequencing (TGS) long reads and Hi-C reads. In this study, we developed a multifunctional toolkit called Chrom-pro that integrated commonly-used algorithms for de novo chromosome-level genome assembly with above three data sets into a user-friendly, automatic workflow. Besides chromosome assembly, Chrom-pro also encompasses multiple functionalities for genome quality assessment, comparative genomic analysis, and structural variant detection, which offers substantial support for downstream research. To evaluate the performance of Chrom-pro software, we tested the software with publicly available sequencing data of mango, pufferfish, and plum, and the excellence was confirmed by achieving a BUSCO completeness score of over 95% as well as high collinearity with the reference genome. Furthermore, we applied Chrom-pro to investigating the impact of different internal algorithm options on the accuracy of chromosome assembly, providing guidance for advancing relevant research in the future. Overall, the development of Chrom-pro will significantly improve the efficiency and quality of chromosome assembly and contributing to the advancement of genomic research.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.