Back

The diversity of clinical Mycobacterium abscessus isolates in morphology, glycopeptidolipids and infection rates in a macrophage model

Pichler, V.; Dalkilic, L.; Shoaib, G.; Shapira, T.; Rankine-Wilson, L.; Boudehen, Y.-M.; Chao, J.; Sexton, D. L.; Prieto, M. D.; Quon, B.; Tocheva, E. I.; Kremer, L.; Hsiao, W.; Av-Gay, Y.

2024-03-01 microbiology
10.1101/2024.02.29.582856 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab) colonies adopt smooth (S) or rough (R) morphotypes, which are linked to the presence or absence of glycopeptidolipids (GPL), respectively. Though clinically relevant, the association between GPL levels, morphotype and pathogenesis are poorly understood. To investigate the degree of correlation between Mab morphology, GPL levels, and infectivity, we generated isolates from Mab-positive sputum samples from cystic fibrosis patients. Isolated strains were categorised based on their morphology, GPL profile, and replication rate in macrophages. Our findings revealed that around 50% of isolates displayed mixed morphologies and GPL analysis confirmed a consistent relationship between GPL content and morphotype was only found in smooth isolates. Across morphotype groups, no differences were observed in vitro, yet using a high-content THP-1 cell ex vivo infection model, clinical R strains were observed to replicate at higher levels. Moreover, the proportion of infected macrophages was notably higher among clinical R strains compared to their S counterparts at 72 hours post-infection. Clinical variants also infected at significantly higher rates compared to laboratory strains, highlighting the limited translatability of lab strain infection data to clinical contexts. Our study confirmed the general correlation between morphotype and GPL levels in smooth strains yet unveiled more variability within morphotype groups than previously recognised, particularly during intracellular infection. As the rough morphotype is of highest clinical concern, these findings contribute to the expanding knowledge base surrounding Mab infections, offering insights that can steer diagnostic methodologies, and treatment approaches.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
4
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
5
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
8
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
9
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
12
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
15
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
18
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
19
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Infection and Immunity
103 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
26
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%