Back

Distinct Escherichia coli transcriptional profiles in the guts of recurrent UTI sufferers revealed by pan-genome hybrid selection

Young, M. G.; Straub, T. J.; Worby, C. J.; Metsky, H. C.; Gnirke, A.; Bronson, R. A.; van Dijk, L. R.; Desjardins, C. A.; Matranga, C.; Qu, J.; Dodson, K.; Schreiber, H. L.; Manson, A. L.; Hultgren, S. J.; Earl, A. M.

2024-02-29 microbiology
10.1101/2024.02.29.582780 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Low-abundance members of microbial communities are difficult to study in their native habitats. This includes Escherichia coli, a minor, but common inhabitant of the gastrointestinal tract and opportunistic pathogen, including of the urinary tract, where it is the primary pathogen. While multi-omic analyses have detailed critical interactions between uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) and the bladder that mediate UTI outcome, comparatively little is known about UPEC in its pre-infection reservoir, partly due to its low abundance there (<1% relative abundance). To accurately and sensitively explore the genomes and transcriptomes of diverse E. coli in gastrointestinal communities, we developed E. coli PanSelect which uses a set of probes designed to specifically recognize and capture E. colis broad pangenome from sequencing libraries. We demonstrated the ability of E. coli PanSelect to enrich, by orders of magnitude, sequencing data from diverse E. coli using a mock community and a set of human stool samples collected as part of a cohort study investigating drivers of recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI). Comparisons of genomes and transcriptomes between E. coli residing in the gastrointestinal tracts of women with and without a history of rUTI suggest that rUTI gut E. coli are responding to increased levels of oxygen and nitrate, suggestive of mucosal inflammation, which may have implications for recurrent disease. E. coli PanSelect is well suited for investigations of native in vivo biology of E. coli in other environments where it is at low relative abundance, and the framework described here has broad applicability to other highly diverse, low abundance organisms.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.