Back

Machine Learning for Predicting Therapeutic Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients

Karathanasis, N.; Papasavva, P.; Oulas, A.; Spyrou, G. M.

2024-03-02 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.02.29.24303536 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and ObjectiveThe standard of care in Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients has remained essentially unchanged for nearly 40 years. Due to the complicated mutational patterns within and between individual patients and a lack of targeted agents for most mutational events, implementing individualized treatment for AML has proven difficult. We reanalysed the BeatAML dataset employing Machine Learning algorithms. The BeatAML project entails patients extensively characterized at the molecular and clinical levels and linked to drug sensitivity outputs. Our approach capitalizes on the molecular and clinical data provided by the BeatAML dataset to predict the ex vivo drug sensitivity for the 122 drugs evaluated by the project. MethodsWe utilized ElasticNet, which produces fully interpretable models, in combination with a two-step training protocol that allowed us to narrow down computations. We automated the genes filtering step by employing two metrics, and we evaluated all possible data combinations to identify the best training configuration settings per drug. ResultsWe report a Pearson correlation across all drugs of 0.36 when clinical and RNA sequencing data were combined, with the best-performing models reaching a Pearson correlation of 0.67. When we trained using the datasets in isolation, we noted that RNA Sequencing data (Pearson: 0.36) attained three times the predictive power of whole exome sequencing data (Pearson: 0.11), with clinical data falling somewhere in between (Pearson 0.26). Lastly, we present a paradigm of clinical significance. We used our models prediction as a health management score to rank an individuals expected response to treatment. We identified 78 patients out of 89 (88%) that the proposed drug was more potent than the administered one based on their ex vivo drug sensitivity data. ConclusionsIn conclusion, our reanalysis of the BeatAML dataset using Machine Learning algorithms demonstrates the potential for individualized treatment prediction in Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients, addressing the longstanding challenge of treatment personalization in this disease. By leveraging molecular and clinical data, our approach yields promising correlations between predicted drug sensitivity and actual responses, highlighting a significant step forward in improving therapeutic outcomes for AML patients. HighlightsO_LIMachine learning can predict response to treatment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients. C_LIO_LIRNA sequencing data are more informative than whole exome sequencing and clinical data in predicting drug response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients. C_LIO_LIDrug response predictions could be used as a health management score to rank the individuals expected response to treatment. C_LIO_LIWe identified a more potent drug than the administered one for 88% (78 out of 89) of the patients examined. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.0%
3
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.3%
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
6
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
7
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.7%
12
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
20
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
The Pharmacogenomics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
26
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%