Oro-faecal transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review of studies employing viral culture from gastrointestinal and other potential sources
Gandini, S.; Conly, J.; Spencer, E. A.; Evans, D.; Rosca, E. C.; Brassey, J.; Maltoni, S.; Onakpoya, I.; Pluddemann, A.; Jefferson, T.; Heneghan, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe extent to which the oro-faecal route contributes to the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is not established. MethodsWe systematically reviewed the evidence on the presence of infectious SARS-CoV-2 in faeces and other gastrointestinal sources by examining studies that used viral culture to investigate the presence of replication-competent virus in these samples. We conducted searches in the WHO Covid-19 Database, LitCovid, medRxiv, and Google Scholar for SARS-CoV-2 using keywords and associated synonyms, with a search date up to 28th of November 2023. ResultsWe included 13 studies involving 328 COVID-19 subjects - providing 314 faecal or rectal swab SARS-CoV2 positive samples tested also with viral culture. The methods used for viral culture across the studies were heterogeneous. Three studies (2 cohorts and 1 case-series) reported observing replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) and whole genome sequencing, and qPCR including appropriate cycle threshold changes. Overall, six (1.9%) of 314 faecal samples subjected to cell culture showed replication-competent virus. One study found replication competent samples from one immunocompromised patient. No studies were identified demonstrating direct evidence of oro-faecal transmission to humans. ConclusionsOur review found a relatively low frequency of replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 in faecal and other gastrointestinal sources. Although it is biologically plausible, more research is needed, using standardized cell culture methods, control groups, adequate follow-up and robust epidemiologic methods, including whether secondary infections occurred, to determine the role of the oro-faecal route in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among children and staff in German daycare centers: results from the COALA study 92%
- Superspreading of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis of event attack rates and individual transmission patterns 92%
- Prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in people attending the two main Goma markets in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections with cumulative and imputed COVID-19 cases: systematic review 94%
- Coronavirus testing indicates transmission risk increases along wildlife supply chains for human consumption in Viet Nam, 2013-2014 93%
- The gut virome of healthy children during the first year of life is diverse and dynamic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimates of epidemiological parameters for H5N1 influenza in humans: a rapid review 92%
- Nasopharyngeal Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) Expression as a Risk-Factor for SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Concurrent Hospital Associated Outbreaks 92%
- Prevalence of Common Respiratory Viruses in Children: Insights from Post-Pandemic Surveillance 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanically ventilated patients shed high titre live SARS-CoV2 for extended periods from both the upper and lower respiratory tract 93%
- Omicron outbreak at a private gathering in the Faroe Islands, infecting 21 of 33 triple-vaccinated healthcare workers 92%
- High household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States: living density, viral load, and disproportionate impact on communities of color 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.