Back

Predicting Patient Weight from Intracardiac Electrograms: A Study in Electrophysiological Signal Analysis

Alagoz, C.

2024-03-02 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.02.29.24303483 medRxiv
Show abstract

The analysis of electrophysiological signals from the human body has become increasingly crucial, especially given the widespread adoption of wearable technologies and the growing trend of remote and online monitoring. In situations where demographic patient data is unavailable, the evaluation of such information from electrophysiological signals becomes imperative for making well-informed diagnostic and therapeutic decisions, particularly in ambulatory and urgent cases. This study underscores the significance of this necessity by utilizing intracardiac electrograms to predict patient weight. Intracardiac electrograms were recorded from 44 patients (14 female, with an average age of 59.2{+/-}11.5 years) using a 64-pole basket catheter over a duration of 60 seconds. A dataset comprising 2,816 unipolar electrogram signal segments, each lasting 4 seconds, was utilized. Weight, considered as a continuous variable, underwent discretization into k bins with uniformly distributed widths, where various values of k were experimented with. As the value of k increases, class imbalance also increases. The state-of-the-art time series classification algorithm, Minirocket, was employed alongside the popular machine learning algorithm eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Minirocket consistently demonstrates superior performance compared to XGBoost across all class number scenarios and across all evaluation metrics, such as accuracy, F1 score, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) values, achieving scores of approximately 0.96. Conversely, XGBoost shows signs of overfitting, particularly noticeable in scenarios with higher class imbalance. Tuning probability thresholds for classes could potentially mitigate this issue. Additionally, XGBoosts performance improves with reduced bin numbers, emphasizing the importance of balanced classes. This study provides novel insights into the predictive capabilities of these algorithms and their implications for personalized medicine and remote health monitoring.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
3
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.6%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.3%
5
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.1%
7
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.3%
9
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
10
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
11
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
12
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
18
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%