Back

Marine Origin of the Arachnid Brain Reveals Early Divergence of Chelicerata

Strausfeld, N. J.; Hirth, F.

2024-11-30 paleontology
10.1101/2024.02.27.582391 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fossils from the lower Cambrian provide crucial insights into the diversification of arthropod lineages: Mandibulata, exemplified by centipedes, insects, and crustaceans; and Chelicerata, represented by sea spiders, horseshoe crabs, and arachnids, the last including spiders, scorpions, and ticks1. Two mid-Cambrian genera claimed as stem chelicerates are Mollisonia and Sanctacaris, defined by a carapaced prosoma equipped with clustered limbs, followed by a segmented trunk opisthosoma equipped with appendages for swimming and respiration2-4. Up to the present, the phyletic status of Mollisoniidae and Sanctacariidae has been that of a basal chelicerate2, stemward of Leanchoiliidae, whose neuromorphology resembles that of extant Merostomata (horseshoe crabs)5. Here, we identify preserved traces of neuronal tissues in Mollisonia symmetrica that crucially depart from a merostome organization. Instead, a radiating organization of metameric neuropils occupying most of its prosoma is situated behind a pair of oval unsegmented neuropils directly connected to paired chelicerae extending from the front of the prosoma. The disposition and connections of these neuropils is the neuroanatomical signature that denotes a complete reversal of the three genetically distinct domains defining arthropod brains6. Thus, in Mollisonia the deutocerebrum is the most rostral domain with the proso-and protocerebral domains folded backwards such that tracts from the principal eyes extend caudally to reach their prosocerebral destination. These defining neuromorphological features illuminate a marine origin of Arachnida from which evolved the planets most successful arthropodan predators.

Published in Current Biology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.