A Qualitative Descriptive Study Exploring Caregivers' Information Needs and Experience Caring for a Child with Chronic Heart Failure
Cunningham, C.; Conway, J.; Zahoui, Z.; Haykowsky, M. J.; Scott, S. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundChronic phenotypes of pediatric heart failure pose life-long burdensome symptoms for the healthcare system and families. Treatment involves complex medical therapies with few surgical options until more advanced, refractory stages. Caregivers must become proficient in providing care to these vulnerable children in the home environment, which imposes a high amount of stress. Despite caregiver demands, little is known about caregiver information needs and experiences caring for a child with chronic heart failure. Therefore, a qualitative approach employing semi-structured interviews aimed to fill this knowledge gap. Methods and ResultsA qualitative descriptive methodology guided our study. Participants were recruited from a tertiary cardiac centre in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently. Semi-structured interviews were conducted until data redundancy was achieved. Inductive content analysis was used to uncover categories. Eleven interviews identified five main categories. Three categories related to information needs: 1) sources of information, 2) profound stress steepens the learning curve, and 3) acknowledging that learning heart failure takes time. Two categories related to experience: 4) the emotional rollercoaster, feelings of emotional distress, and 5) the hard reality of caring for a child with heart failure: always on the clock. ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first North American situated qualitative study to provide insights about caregivers information needs and experiences caring for a child with chronic heart failure. This knowledge will enhance future information provision, optimizing clinical care and outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Caregivers’ and nurses’ perceptions of the Smart Discharges Program for children with sepsis in Uganda: A descriptive qualitative study 95%
- Hidden stories of caregivers with children living with sickle cell disease in Uganda: experiences, coping strategies and outcomes 95%
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal caregiving following stroke: a qualitative exploration of carer self-identification, care-related language and support experiences 95%
- The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on those with lifelong conditions: a case study of congenital heart disease 94%
- Co-designing an online COmmunity suPporting familiEs after Sudden Cardiac Death (COPE-SCD) in the young 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Needs Analysis of Parents Following Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young 92%
- Language Matters -Representations of ‘heart failure’ in English discourse: a large-scale linguistic study 89%
- Multispecialty multidisciplinary input into comorbidities in heart failure reduces hospitalisation and clinic attendance 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stakeholder perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to integrating cardiovascular disease and diabetes management at primary care in Kenya 94%
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 94%
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions and willingness of patients and caregivers on the utilization of patient-generated health data: a cross-sectional survey 92%
- Mental health challenges and the associated factors in HIV-positive women who have children living with HIV in Indonesia: A qualitative study 92%
- A Cohort Study: Evaluating Self-Efficacy in Adolescents Attending a Tailored Youth-Informed Breastfeeding Program 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.