Yemeni university students public perceptions toward the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional study
Hatem, N. A. H.; Ibrahim, M. I. M.; Yousuf, S. A.
Show abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has emerged as a transformative force, promising to enhance medical diagnosis, treatment, and overall healthcare delivery. Hence, this study investigates the university students perceptions toward using AI in healthcare. A cross-sectional survey was conducted at two major universities using a paper-based questionnaire from September 2023 to November 2023. Participants views regarding using artificial intelligence in healthcare were investigated using 25 items distributed across five domains. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for the comparison of variables. The response rate for the survey was 75%, with a sample size of 279. More than half of the participants (52%, n = 145) expressed their belief in AIs potential to reduce treatment errors in the future. However, about (61.6%, n = 172) of participants fear the influence of AI that could prevent doctors from learning to make correct patient care judgments, and it was widely agreed (69%) that doctors should ultimately maintain final control over patient care. Participants with experience with AI, such as engaging with AI chatbots, significantly reported higher scores in both the "Benefits and Positivity Toward AI in Healthcare" and "Concerns and Fears" domains (p = 0.024) and (p = 0.026), respectively. The identified cautious optimism, concerns, and fears highlight the delicate balance required for successful AI integration. The findings emphasize the importance of addressing specific concerns, promoting positive experiences with AI, and establishing transparent communication channels. Insights from such research can guide the development of ethical frameworks, policies, and targeted interventions, fostering a harmonious integration of AI into the healthcare landscape in developing countries.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
- Risk perceptions and preventive practices of COVID-19 among healthcare professionals in public hospitals in Ethiopia 94%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 96%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 94%
- Cracking the Code: A Scoping Review to Unite Disciplines in Tackling Legal Issues in Health Artificial Intelligence 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 95%
- Exploring Factors Affecting the Adoption and Continuance Usage of Drone in Healthcare: The Role of the Environment 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning from the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 95%
- The role of IT ambidexterity, digital dynamic capability and knowledge processes as enablers of patient agility: an empirical study 95%
- Lessons learned from the resilience of Chinese hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 95%
- Nowcasting and Forecasting the Spread of COVID-19 and Healthcare Demand In Turkey, A Modelling Study 93%
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.