Endometriosis Online Communities: A Quantitative Analysis
Bologna, F.; Thalken, R.; Pepin, K.; Wilkens, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundEndometriosis is a chronic condition that affects 10% of people with a uterus. Due to the complex social and psychological impacts caused by the condition, people with endometriosis often turn to online health communities (OHCs) for support. ObjectivePrior work identifies a lack of large-scale analyses of endometriosis patient experiences and of OHCs. Our study fills this gap by investigating aspects of the condition and aggregate user needs that emerge from two endometriosis OHCs, r/Endo and r/endometriosis. MethodsWe leverage topic modeling and supervised machine learning to identify associations between a posts subject matter ("topics"), the people and relationships ("personas") mentioned, and the type of support the post seeks ("intent"). ResultsThe most discussed topics in posts are medical stories, medical appointments, sharing symptoms, menstruation, and empathy. In addition, when discussing medical appointments, users are more likely to mention the endometriosis OHCs than medical professionals. Furthermore, medical professional is the least likely of any persona to be associated with empathy. Posts that mention partner or family are likely to discuss topics from the life issues category, in particular fertility. Lastly, we find that while users seek experiential knowledge regarding treatments and healthcare processes, they also wish to vent and to establish emotional connections about the life-altering aspects of the condition. ConclusionsEndometriosis OHCs provide members a space where they can discuss care pathways, learn to manage symptoms, and receive validation. Our results emphasize the need for greater empathy within clinical settings, easier access to appointments, more information on care pathways, and further support for patient loved ones. In addition, this study demonstrates the value of quantitative analyses of OHCs: they can support and extend findings from small-scale studies about patient experiences and provide insight into hard-to-reach groups. Lastly, analyses of OHCs can help design interventions to improve care, as argued in previous studies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Long COVID symptoms from Reddit: Characterizing post-COVID syndrome from patient reports 93%
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Annotation of Medication Mentions in Primary Care Visit Conversations 91%
- Trajectories: a framework for detecting temporal clinical event sequences from health data standardized to the OMOP Common Data Model 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Deep Learning Approach for Transgender and Gender Diverse Patient Identification in Electronic Health Records 92%
- Creating an Ignorance-Base: Exploring Known Unknowns in the Scientific Literature 92%
- Using computable knowledge mined from the literature to elucidate confounders for EHR-based pharmacovigilance 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal Recruitment for an Internet-Based Pilot Study of Ovulation and Menstruation (OM) Health 94%
- Tracking private WhatsApp discourse about COVID-19: A longitudinal infodemiology study in Singapore 93%
- “Is this Herpes or Syphilis?”: Latent Dirichlet Allocation Analysis of Sexually Transmitted Disease-Related Reddit Posts During the COVID-19 Pandemic 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.