Back

Oxytocin and shared intentionality drive variation in cooperation in children

McClung, J.; Triki, Z.; Lancheros Pompeyo, M.; Fassier, R.; Emery, Y.; Bangerter, A.; Clement, F.; Bshary, R.

2024-02-26 developmental biology
10.1101/2024.02.25.581910 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While humans cooperate with unrelated individuals to an extent that far outstrips any other species, we also display extreme variation in decisions about whether to cooperate or not. A diversity of cognitive, affective, social, and physiological mechanisms interact to shape these decisions. For example, group membership, shared intentionality talk (i.e. talk about shared goals), and natural initial oxytocin levels affect cooperation in adults in an optimal foraging paradigm that is loosely modelled on the iterated prisoners dilemma. In this egg hunt, shared intentionality talk was key to achieve cooperation, and it occurred more between participants who shared the same group membership and had higher initial oxytocin levels. Such complex interactions raise the question of the age at which humans develop the necessary mechanisms to cooperate effectively in the egg hunt game. Here, we tested children in secondary school aged between 10 and 14 years. We found that, as for adults, shared intentionality talk was crucial for successful cooperation. Furthermore, initial oxytocin levels affected cooperation through shared intentionality talk. In contrast, group membership did not affect behaviour. Finally, pre- and post-experiment oxytocin levels showed various interactions with group membership and gender. Thus, childrens performance was relatively similar to adults while showing some differences with respect to underlying mechanisms. Our study is a rare contribution to further our understanding of the role of oxytocin in early adolescent social behaviour.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.2%
2
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.1%
7
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
10
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
15
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
17
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
19
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%