Back

Complete chromosome 21 centromere sequences from a Down syndrome family reveal size asymmetry and differences in kinetochore attachment

Mastrorosa, F. K.; Rozanski, A. N.; Harvey, W. T.; Knuth, J.; Garcia, G.; Munson, K. M.; Hoekzema, K.; Logsdon, G. A.; Eichler, E. E.

2024-02-26 genomics
10.1101/2024.02.25.581464 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Down syndrome, the most common form of human intellectual disability, is caused by nondisjunction and chromosome 21 trisomy (T21). Small centromeres have been hypothesized to contribute to its aetiology and studies on mammals suggest that larger centromeres are more efficiently transmitted, yet complete sequencing of chromosome 21 (chr21) centromeres has been particularly challenging. Using long-read sequencing, we sequenced and assembled the centromeres from eight families that include a child with free T21 (1 trio, 6 child-mother duos, and 1 singleton) all resulting from maternal meiosis I errors. Two of these families carry the smallest chr21 centromeres (143 and 181 kbp) observed in female individuals to date, exhibiting a [~]10.7- and [~]19.4-fold centromeric -satellite higher-order repeat array size difference between the maternally inherited homologs, respectively. In both cases, the longer centromere harbors a poorly defined centromere dip region, marked by DNA hypomethylation, in the proband but not in the mother. A comparison of all proband chr21 centromeres (n=24) to those of controls (n=261) shows that small centromeres are not enriched in families with T21 (p-value=0.73); contrarily, chr21 extreme centromere size asymmetry (>10-fold) is unique of T21 (p-value=0.003), suggesting that this feature may represent a genetic risk factor for a subset of families with free T21. Additionally, phylogenetic reconstruction reveals that human chr21 has been particularly prone to such variation with some of the biggest size differences occurring over the last [~]17 thousand years of human evolution.

Published in The American Journal of Human Genetics (predicted rank #11) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.