Back

Effects of prenatal maternal immune activation and exposure to circadian disruption during adolescence: exploring the two-hit model of neurodevelopmental disorders

Delorme, T. C.; Arcego, D. M.; Penichet, D.; O'Toole, N.; Huebener, N.; Silveira, P. P.; Srivastava, L. K.; Cermakian, N.

2024-02-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.02.25.580567 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAround 80% of individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) such as schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders experience disruptions in sleep/circadian rhythms. We explored whether prenatal infection, an established risk factor for NDDs, and environmental circadian disruption synergistically induced sex-specific deficits in mice. MethodsA maternal immune activation (MIA) protocol was used by injecting pregnant mice (at E9.5) with a viral mimic poly IC or saline. Then, juvenile/adolescent offspring (3-7 weeks old) were subjected to either standard lighting (12:12LD) or constant light (LL). ResultsWe found interactions of the two factors on behaviors related to cognition, anxiety, and sociability. Also, poly IC exposure led to a more activated profile of hippocampal microglia in males only, while LL diminished these effects. Using RNA sequencing in the dorsal hippocampus, we found that poly IC exposure led to many differentially expressed genes in males (but not females), and fewer differentially expressed genes were observed after LL exposure. Using the WGCNA analysis, we found several significant gene modules positively associated with poly IC (in comparison to saline exposure) and LL (in comparison to LD exposure) in males, and less so in females. Interestingly, many of the identified hub bottleneck genes were homologous to human genes associated with both sleep/circadian rhythms and neurodevelopmental disorders as identified by GWA studies. ConclusionsOur work demonstrates that in a mouse model of prenatal infection, disruptions in circadian rhythms induced by LL play a role in modulating the effects of MIA at behavioral, cellular, and molecular levels.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.