Back

Diverse Relationships Between Antibiotic Resistance and Host Age: A Meta-Analysis Across Antibiotic Classes and Bacterial Genera

Binsted, L. E.; McNally, L.

2024-02-27 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.02.25.24303263 medRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses an urgent public health challenge. To improve patient outcomes and design interventions we must identify patient characteristics which predict the presence of AMR pathogens. One potential and commonly collected patient characteristic is host age, consensus remains elusive regarding its impact on the probability of infecting pathogens being resistant to antimicrobials. Here, we employ a meta-analysis to consolidate and compare these previous studies and examine the relationship between antibiotic resistance and host age across bacteria and antibiotics. We show that although the probability that infecting bacteria are antimicrobial resistant increases with host age on average, diverse patterns exist across antibiotic classes and bacterial genera, including negative, humped, and U-shaped relationships. We further illustrate, using a compartmental epidemiological model, that this variation is likely driven by differences in antibiotic consumption or incidence of bacterial infection/carriage between age groups, combined with age assortative transmission. These findings imply that empirical antibiotic therapy could be improved by considering age-specific local resistance levels (compared with overall local resistance levels), resulting in improved treatment success and reduced spread of antibiotic resistance. They additionally display consequences of assuming population homogeneity in epidemiological models. Finally, they indicate that the landscape of the already severe resistance crisis is likely to change as the age distribution of the human population shifts.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.1%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.3%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.9%
5
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
10
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.6%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
17
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
18
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
22
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%