Back

Diverse Relationships Between Antibiotic Resistance and Host Age: A Meta-Analysis Across Antibiotic Classes and Bacterial Genera

Binsted, L. E.; McNally, L.

2024-02-27 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.02.25.24303263
Show abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses an urgent public health challenge. To improve patient outcomes and design interventions we must identify patient characteristics which predict the presence of AMR pathogens. One potential and commonly collected patient characteristic is host age, consensus remains elusive regarding its impact on the probability of infecting pathogens being resistant to antimicrobials. Here, we employ a meta-analysis to consolidate and compare these previous studies and examine the relationship between antibiotic resistance and host age across bacteria and antibiotics. We show that although the probability that infecting bacteria are antimicrobial resistant increases with host age on average, diverse patterns exist across antibiotic classes and bacterial genera, including negative, humped, and U-shaped relationships. We further illustrate, using a compartmental epidemiological model, that this variation is likely driven by differences in antibiotic consumption or incidence of bacterial infection/carriage between age groups, combined with age assortative transmission. These findings imply that empirical antibiotic therapy could be improved by considering age-specific local resistance levels (compared with overall local resistance levels), resulting in improved treatment success and reduced spread of antibiotic resistance. They additionally display consequences of assuming population homogeneity in epidemiological models. Finally, they indicate that the landscape of the already severe resistance crisis is likely to change as the age distribution of the human population shifts.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 12%
11.1%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 1%
11.1%
3
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 3%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 65%
5.8%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 2%
5.0%
6
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 21%
2.9%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 9%
2.8%
8
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
based on 54 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
11
PLOS Biology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 4%
2.4%
13
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 9%
2.3%
14
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 6%
1.6%
16
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
17
PNAS Nexus
based on 22 papers
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 14%
1.2%
19
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
20
Journal of Theoretical Biology
based on 29 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
22
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 18%
0.7%
23
Science Advances
based on 52 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
25
mBio
based on 34 papers
Top 4%
0.7%