Syndemic Geographic Patterns of Cancer Types in a Health Deprived Area of England: a new Paradigm for Public Health Cancer Interventions?
Jones, C.; Keegan, T.; Knox, A.; Birtle, A.; Mendes, J.; Heys, K.; Atkinson, P.; Sedda, L.
Show abstract
Cancer poses a significant public health challenge, and accurate tools are crucial for effective intervention, especially in high-risk areas. The North West of England, historically identified as a region with high cancer incidence, has become a focus for public health initiatives. This study aims to analyse cancer risk factors, demographic trends and spatial patterns in this region by employing a novel spatial joint modelling framework designed to account for large frequencies of left-censored data. Cancer diagnoses were collected at the postcode sector level. The dataset was left-censored due to confidentiality issues, and categorised as interval censored. Demographic and behavioural factors, alongside socio-economic variables, both at individual and geographic unit levels, were obtained from the linkage of primary and secondary health data and various open source datasets. An ecological investigation was conducted using joint spatial modelling on nine cancer types (breast, colorectal, gynaecology, haematology, head and neck, lung, skin, upper GI, urology), for which explanatory factors were selected by employing an accelerated failure model with lognormal distribution. Post-processing included principal components analysis and hierarchical clustering to delineate geographic areas with similar spatial patterns of different cancer types. The study included 15,506 cancer diagnoses from 2017 to 2022, with the highest incidence in skin, breast and urology cancers. Preliminary censoring adjustments reduced censored records from 86% to 60%. Factors such as age, ethnicity, frailty and comorbidities were associated with cancer risk. The analysis identified 22 relevant variables, with comorbidities and ethnicity being prominent. The spatial distribution of the risk and cumulative risk of the cancer types revealed regional variations, with five clusters identified. Rural areas were the least affected by cancer and Barrow-in-Furness was the area with the highest cancer risk. This study emphasizes the need for targeted interventions addressing health inequalities in different geographical regions. The findings suggest the need for tailored public health interventions, considering specific risk factors and socio-economic disparities. Policymakers can utilize the spatial patterns identified to allocate resources effectively and implement targeted cancer prevention programmes.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A spatial model to optimise predictions of COVID-19 incidence risk in Belgium using symptoms as reported in a large-scale online survey 90%
- A joint hierarchical model for the number of cases and deaths due to COVID-19 across the boroughs of Montreal 90%
- The correlation between small papillary thyroid cancers and gamma radionuclides Cs-137, Th-232, U-238 and K-40 using spatially-explicit, register-based methods 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of Second Primary Cancers After a Diagnosis of First Primary Cancer: A Pan-Cancer Analysis and Mendelian Randomization Study 93%
- Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study 92%
- Disentangling the relationship between cancer mortality and COVID-19 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative COVID-19 incidence, mortality, and prognosis in cancer survivors: a population-based study in Reggio Emilia, Northern Italy 91%
- Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer incidence and mortality in Canada 90%
- Cancer and the risk of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalisation, and death: a population-based multi-state cohort study including 4,618,377 adults in Catalonia, Spain 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between socioeconomic status and mobility reductions in the early stage of England’s COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- Assessing the risk of endogeneity bias in health and mortality inequalities research using composite measures of multiple deprivation which include health-related indicators: A case study using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation and population health and mortality data 90%
- Continuing inequalities in COVID-19 mortality in England and Wales, and the changing importance of regional, over local, deprivation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in the decline and recovery of pathological cancer diagnoses during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study 93%
- Immortal time bias in older vs younger age groups: a simulation study with application to a population-based cohort of patients with colon cancer 89%
- Distinct temporal trends in breast cancer incidence from 1997 to 2016 by molecular subtypes: A population-based study of Scottish cancer registry data 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.