Back

Steeper or Faster? Impacts of Similar-intensity Running Conditions on Heart Rate Variability

ElDash, V. M.; ElDash, I. M. C. A.; Marques, F. S.; Natali, J. E. S.; Chaui-Berlinck, J. G.

2024-02-28 physiology
10.1101/2024.02.23.581819 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Increases in speed or slope promote different adjustments in the locomotor system and lead to a higher heart rate (HR). Because heart rate variability (HRV) is known to respond to exercise intensity and to biomechanical stimuli, we aimed to answer whether HRV would be sensitive to changes in speed and/or slope under similar HR. We hypothesize that HRV would depend solely on HR. To test this hypothesis, 6 healthy male runners (age 30 {+/-} 7.5 yrs.) were recruited and a velocity V, with similar HR/HRmax was selected per volunteer. Changes in HR were referred to these particular velocities V, resulting in comparable exercise intensities. HRV was estimated through standard deviation (sdt) and root mean square of successive RR intervals (rmst), normalized per volunteer. Four running conditions were compared. We found that rmst decreased with speed and slope, with significant interaction between the independent variables. The run {0.7 V, 0% slope} was different from the remaining 3 conditions, which, in turn, were no different from one another. Thus, this estimator did not show a distinct sensitivity to variations in speed or slope. On the other hand, sdt decreased with both speed and slope, with no significant interactions. The runs performed at {0.7 V, 0% slope} and {0.7 V, 6% slope} were different from those at {1 V, 0% slope} and {1 V, 6% slope}. Therefore, sdt presented different values under similar HR. This finding leads us to conclude that cardiac control operates sensitively due to the mode of the changes imposed on the metabolic demand. Summary StatementDoes heart rate variability respond similarly to running in different combinations of speed and slope? While one estimator depended on the exercise intensity, another was sensitive to the running conditions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.3%
3
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
9
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
11
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
13
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
22
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%