Back

Laboratory application of the Aquascope approach of automated imaging and classification for long-term plankton monitoring

Merkli, S.; Reyes, M.; Pomati, F.

2024-02-24 ecology
10.1101/2024.02.23.581739 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Anthropogenic changes such as climate change and pollution have strong effects on plankton and its ecosystem services. In freshwater, phytoplankton forms the basis of the food web and plays a key role in water quality. It is therefore important to monitor the plankton community. In Switzerland, lake plankton has been monitored for decades by cantonal authorities. But in the future, there will be a limitation in the availability of trained taxonomists that are able to count plankton samples under the microscope as well as time and budget constraints. New technologies will be needed to fulfil the federal requirements on the monitoring of lakes in the future. Here we focus on two such instruments, both based on plankton automated imaging: the FlowCam and the Aquascope. The first is a commercially available instrument, the second is custom made. They are the only automated imaging instruments that can track freshwater plankton across the desired size range (phytoplankton and zooplankton). Their design makes them the state of the art technologies to make quantitative observations of plankton. While the FlowCam is a laboratory instrument, the Aquascope is originally designed for field deployment. In this report, we focus the empirical work on the laboratory application of the Aquascope approach of automated imaging and classification for long term plankton monitoring. We find that there are major advantages of the Aquascope approach but the application as a laboratory instrument still needs further development. The major advantages of the Aquascope approach compared to traditional, human-supervised, microscopy methods are the automation and the speed of the data processing, the availability of individual level traits and the management of the data generated. One of the major drawbacks is the lack of taxonomic resolution (mostly at the genus level). Nevertheless, we show that with a larger benchmarking project, it might be possible to continue the long term time series on a coarse taxonomic level as usually reported by cantonal authorities to the general public. We discuss advantages and limitations of Aquascope relative to traditional microscopy and FlowCam, and propose ways forward for future development and application of this approach.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.8%
2
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
3
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
5
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.5%
6
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
8
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
11
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
13
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
14
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
17
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
18
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
19
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
20
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
22
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
24
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
25
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%