A Machine Learning Framework to Identify the Correlates of Disease Severity in Acute Arbovirus Infection
Herder, V.; Caporale, M.; MacLean, O.; Pintus, D.; Huang, X.; Nomikou, K.; Palmalux, N.; Nichols, J.; Scivoli, R.; Boutell, C.; Taggart, A.; Allan, J.; Malik, H.; Ilia, G.; Gu, Q.; Ronchi, G. F.; Furnon, W.; Zientara, S.; Breard, E.; Antonucci, D.; Capista, S.; Giansante, D.; Cocco, A.; Mercante, M. T.; Di Ventura, M.; Filipe, A. D. S.; Puggioni, G.; Sevilla, N.; Stewart, M.; Ligios, C.; Palmarini, M.
Show abstract
Most viral diseases display a variable clinical outcome due to differences in virus strain virulence and/or individual host susceptibility to infection. Understanding the biological mechanisms differentiating a viral infection displaying severe clinical manifestations from its milder forms can provide the intellectual framework toward therapies and early prognostic markers. This is especially true in arbovirus infections, where most clinical cases are present as mild febrile illness. Here, we used a naturally occurring vector-borne viral disease of ruminants, bluetongue, as an experimental system to uncover the fundamental mechanisms of virus-host interactions resulting in distinct clinical outcomes. As with most viral diseases, clinical symptoms in bluetongue can vary dramatically. We reproduced experimentally distinct clinical forms of bluetongue infection in sheep using three bluetongue virus (BTV) strains (BTV-1IT2006, BTV-1IT2013 and BTV-8FRA2017). Infected animals displayed clinical signs varying from clinically unapparent, to mild and severe disease. We collected and integrated clinical, haematological, virological, and histopathological data resulting in the analyses of 332 individual parameters from each infected and uninfected control animal. We subsequently used machine learning to identify the key viral and host processes associated with disease pathogenesis. We identified five different fundamental processes affecting the severity of bluetongue: (i) virus load and replication in target organs, (ii) modulation of the host type-I IFN response, (iii) pro-inflammatory responses, (iv) vascular damage, and (v) immunosuppression. Overall, our study using an agnostic machine learning approach, can be used to prioritise the different pathogenetic mechanisms affecting the disease outcome of an arbovirus infection.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Frequent first-trimester pregnancy loss in rhesus macaques infected with African-lineage Zika virus 95%
- Phenotyping the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 variants in hamsters by digital pathology and machine learning 95%
- Breakthrough infections by SARS-CoV-2 variants boost cross-reactive hybrid immune responses in mRNA-vaccinated Golden Syrian Hamsters 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Infection and transmission of ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and its alpha variant in pregnant white-tailed deer 95%
- Susceptibility of sheep to experimental co-infection with the ancestral lineage of SARS-CoV-2 and its alpha variant 95%
- Pigs are highly susceptible to but do not transmit mink-derived highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Natural history of nonhuman primates after conjunctival exposure to Ebola virus 94%
- Long-read Assays Shed New Light on the Transcriptome Complexity of a Viral Pathogen and on Virus-Host Interaction 93%
- TREM-1 activation is a key regulator in driving severe pathogenesis of enterovirus 71 infection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pathology and immunity after SARS-CoV-2 infection in male ferrets is affected by age and inoculation route 95%
- Simultaneous infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome and influenza viruses abrogates clinical protection induced by live attenuated porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome vaccination 93%
- Live virus neutralisation of the 501Y.V1 and 501Y.V2 SARS-CoV-2 variants following INO-4800 vaccination of ferrets 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.