Back

Prevalence of Depression and Associated Socio-economic Outcomes during Violent Conflict: A Matched Analysis for Palestine Using Nationally Representative Survey and Conflict Event Data

Ronzani, P.; Stojetz, W.; Stammel, N.; Boettche, M.; Zardetto, D.; Fenzl, S.; Salhab, M.; Anderson, J. M.; Finn, A.; Aghajanian, A.; Brück, T.

2024-02-24 health economics
10.1101/2024.02.23.24303259 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMental health risks are high in conflict settings, but mental health research mostly focuses on non-conflict settings. Survey data from active conflict settings often suffer from low response rates, unrepresentative samples, and a lack of detailed information on the roots and implications of poor mental health. We overcome these challenges by analyzing nationally representative evidence on the prevalence, sources, and socio-economic correlates of depression, a highly disabling and costly public health issue, in an active conflict setting. MethodsWe analyze nationally and sub-nationally representative geocoded survey data from the Palestinians Psychological Conditions Survey, collected from 5,877 Palestinian individuals in West Bank and Gaza in 2022. We calculate representative depression statistics, disaggregate by sub-areas and across socio-demographic groups, and estimate the associations with geocoded violent conflict event data as well as survey-based trauma exposure across conflict types and socio-economic outcomes. Findings58 percent (SE=2{middle dot}21) of adults in Palestine exhibit depressive symptoms. Prevalence is highest in Gaza (71 percent, SE=2{middle dot}70), increases with exposure to violent conflict and traumatic events, and is associated with worse socio-economic outcomes. The associated losses for 2022 are equivalent to 732,555 Years Lost in Disability, representing 8{middle dot}9 percent of Palestines GDP. InterpretationThose exposed to violence and traumatic events are disproportionately affected by depression in conflict settings, which may fuel poverty and instability. Scalable investments in mental health in conflict settings promise to not only support well-being but also strengthen productivity and social cohesion for a given level of violence. FundingThe study received funding by the World Banks State and Peace Building Trust Fund.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
18.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.9%
3
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
5
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
9
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
10
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
11
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.5%
13
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
16
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
21
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%