Drone-delivered Automated External Defibrillators for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A simulation study.
Smith, C.; Phillips, J.; Powell, C.; Sheehan, A.; O Sullivan, M.; Rees, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation at least doubles survival to hospital discharge following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Members of the public can perform both before the ambulance service arrives. However, bystanders use a public-access Automated External Defibrillator (AED) in around 5% of cases. Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles ( drones) to deliver AEDs may overcome many of the barriers preventing public-access AED use. We investigated how quickly and easily bystanders performing CPR could use drone-delivered AEDs. MethodsWe developed an AED-capable drone between May and November 2020. In July and September 2021, we conducted eighteen out-of-hospital cardiac arrest simulations. A single participant found a simulated patient inside a building and made a 999-call to a Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust call-handler. Once cardiac arrest was confirmed during the 999-call a nearby drone launched, reached hovering altitude and delivered the AED immediately outside the building. The participant retrieved the AED when instructed to do so, attached it to the patient and delivered a single shock. The primary outcome was hands-off CPR time. We investigated ease of AED retrieval via a questionnaire adapted from the System Usability Scale and explored participant behaviours via brief post-simulation interviews and reviews of audio (999-call) and video recordings of the simulation. ResultsHands-off CPR time was (median) 109s (interquartile range 87-130s). Participants spent 19s (16-22s) away from the patients side when retrieving the AED. They found it easy to use the AED but often sought reassurance from the call-handler that it was appropriate for them to retrieve it. ConclusionParticipants found it easy to retrieve and use an AED delivered by drone in simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Hands-off CPR time was potentially clinically relevant in this lone bystander simulation, but there was only a small increase in hands-off time caused by retrieval of the drone-delivered AED. O_TEXTBOXWhat is already known on this topic - summarise the state of scientific knowledge on this subject before you did your study and why this study needed to be doneDrones have been used to deliver AEDs in simulation studies across the world and in a real-life pilot in Sweden. Real-world success is so far limited, and no functioning system for this to happen in real-world out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in the UK. What this study adds - summarise what we now know as a result of this study that we did not know beforeWe have demonstrated a feasible drone-delivered AED system. Lone bystanders spent a median of 19 seconds away from the patient to retrieve the drone-delivered AED. Interaction with the drone and AED was not difficult, and the 999 call-handler has a vital role in facilitating safe and timely retrieval of the drone-delivered AED. How this study might affect research, practice or policy - summarise the implications of this studyLone bystanders are currently not instructed by ambulance services to leave a patient to retrieve a nearby public-access AED, but collecting an AED delivered directly to them may be appropriate. The next step in developing a drone-delivered AED system for real-world use in the UK is to integrate a drone-delivered AED system into an ambulance services Emergency Operations Centre system and to test the out-of-hospital cardiac arrests response in prolonged beyond visual-line-of-sight drone flights. C_TEXTBOX
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Diversity of CPR manikins for basic life support education: Use of manikin sex, race, and body shape – A scoping review 95%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 94%
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of self-triage tools to nurse driven triage in the emergency department 93%
- Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol 93%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 93%
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 93%
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of a Continuous Single Lead Electrocardiogram Analytic to Predict Patient Deterioration Requiring Rapid Response Team Activation 91%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 91%
- Identification of physiological adverse events using continuous vital signs monitoring during paediatric critical care transport: a novel data-driven approach 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Establishing consensus on emergency department interventions that could be conducted in sub-acute care settings for non-emergent paramedic transported visits: A RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study 93%
- Heterogeneity in risk, testing and outcome of COVID-19 across outbreak settings in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada: an observational study 89%
- Derivation And Validation Of A Clinical Score To Predict Death Among Non-Palliative COVID-19 Patients Presenting To Emergency Departments: The Ccedrrn COVID Mortality Score 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.