Changes in opioid prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: cohort study of 20 million patients in OpenSAFELY-TPP
Schaffer, A. L.; Andrews, C. D.; Brown, A. D.; Croker, R.; Hulme, W. J.; Nab, L.; Quinlan, J.; Speed, V.; Wood, C.; Wiedemann, M.; Massey, J.; Inglesby, P.; Bacon, S. C.; Mehrkar, A.; Bates, C.; Goldacre, B.; The OpenSAFELY Collaborative, ; Walker, A. J.; MacKenna, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery, including difficulty accessing in-person care, which may have increased the need for strong pharmacological pain relief. MethodsWith NHS England approval, we used routine clinical data from >20 million general practice adult patients in OpenSAFELY-TPP. Using interrupted time series analysis, we quantified prevalent and new opioid prescribing prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2018-February 2020), and during lockdown (March 2020-March 2021) and recovery periods (April 2021-June 2022), overall and stratified by demographics (age, sex, deprivation, ethnicity, geographic region) and to people in care homes. OutcomesThe median number of people prescribed an opioid per month was 50.9 per 1000 patients prior to the pandemic. There was little change in prevalent prescribing during the pandemic, except for a temporary increase in March 2020. We observed a 9.8% (95%CI -14.5%, -6.5%) reduction in new opioid prescribing from March 2020, sustained to June 2022 for all demographic groups except people 80+ years. Among care home residents, in April 2020 new opioid prescribing increased by 112.5% (95%CI 92.2%, 134.9%) and parenteral opioid prescribing increased by 186.3% (95%CI 153.1%, 223.9%). InterpretationNew opioid prescribing increased among older people and care home residents, likely reflecting use to treat end-of-life COVID-19 symptoms, but decreased among most other groups. Further research is needed to understand what is driving the reduction in new opioid prescribing and its relation to changes to health care provision during the pandemic. FundingThe OpenSAFELY Platform is supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust (222097/Z/20/Z) and MRC (MR/V015737/1, MC_PC_20059, MR/W016729/1). In addition, development of OpenSAFELY has been funded by the Longitudinal Health and Wellbeing strand of the National Core Studies programme (MC_PC_20030: MC_PC_20059), the NIHR funded CONVALESCENCE programme (COV-LT-0009), NIHR (NIHR135559, COV-LT2-0073), and the Data and Connectivity National Core Study funded by UK Research and Innovation (MC_PC_20058) and Health Data Research UK (HDRUK2021.000). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS England, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) or the Department of Health and Social Care. Evidence before this studyWe searched Pubmed for publications between 1 March 2020 and 8 January 2023 using the following search terms: ("COVID-19" OR "SARS-CoV-2") AND ("United Kingdom" OR "England" OR "Britain" OR "Scotland" OR "Wales") AND ("opioid"). We also searched the reference list of relevant articles. We included research studies (excluding conference abstracts and editorials) that quantified opioid prescribing or use in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies focussed solely on opioid substitution therapy for treatment of opioid use disorder were excluded. We identified four studies. One described opioid use among a cohort of people on a waiting list for hip or knee arthroplasty in Scotland (n=548) and found higher rates of long-term opioid use during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with historical controls. The second study quantified changes in opioid prescribing using English aggregate prescription data. This study found no changes in opioid prescribing after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The third study of 1.3 million people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases found a decrease in new opioid users among people with certain conditions, but not in the number of overall prescriptions. The last study of 34,711 people newly diagnosed with cancer and 30,256 who died of cancer in Wales found increases in strong opioid prescribing in both populations. Added value of this studyThis is the largest study (>20 million patients) of opioid prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic in a representative sample of the population of England. We used person-level data to quantify changes in the number of people prescribed opioids and identified that prevalent opioid prescribing changed little, with the exception of a temporary increase at the start of the first lockdown. However, we also identified meaningful reductions in new opioid prescribing. While our findings confirm previous studies quantifying variation in opioid prescribing by sex, ethnicity, region and deprivation, we showed that changes to new prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic were experienced approximately similarly across these subgroups. The exceptions were older people and people in care homes. The latter group experienced substantial increases in new opioid prescribing (especially parenteral opioids, which are used in palliative care) coinciding with periods of greatest COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Implications of all the available evidenceThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in substantial disruptions to the healthcare system. Despite concerns that difficulty or delays in providing care during the pandemic may have led to shifts from non-pharmacological treatments to greater opioid prescribing, we observed no increases in prescribing prevalence in most demographic groups in England. The one major exception is people residing in care homes, where the observed prescribing patterns suggest use to treat end of life symptoms, consistent with best practice. However, our findings do not preclude increased prescribing in high risk subgroups, such as people on procedure waiting lists. Further research to quantify changes in this population is warranted.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fentanyl, Heroin, and Methamphetamine-Based Counterfeit Pills Sold at Tourist-Oriented Pharmacies in Mexico: An Ethnographic and Drug Checking Study 91%
- Medication Improves Age Disparities in Six-Month Treatment Retention for Opioid Use Disorder 91%
- Steep increases in fentanyl-related mortality west of the Mississippi River: synthesizing recent evidence from county and state surveillance 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time trends and prescribing patterns of opioid drugs in UK primary care patients with non-cancer pain: a retrospective cohort study 95%
- Adverse Outcomes and Mortality in Users of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study 90%
- Overall and cause-specific hospitalisation and death after COVID-19 hospitalisation in England: cohort study in OpenSAFELY using linked primary care, secondary care and death registration data 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Medicines Intelligence Data Platform: A population-based data resource from New South Wales, Australia 91%
- Using quantitative bias analysis to adjust for misclassification of COVID-19 outcomes: An applied example of inhaled corticosteroids and COVID-19 outcomes 91%
- Longitudinal effects of using and discontinuing CNS medications on cognitive functioning 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sales of over-the-counter products containing codeine in 31 countries, 2013-2019: a retrospective observational study 95%
- Preventable deaths involving medicines in England and Wales, 2013-22: a systematic case series of coroners’ reports 92%
- Large-scale empirical identification of candidate comparators for pharmacoepidemiological studies 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acute Pain Pathways: protocol for a prospective cohort study 94%
- How many medications do doctors in primary care use? An observational study of the DU90% indicator in primary care in England. 92%
- An overview of global monitoring systems for the side effects and adverse events associated with medicinal cannabis use: A scoping review using a systematic approach 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.