Back

Direction-aware functional class scoring enrichment analysis of Infinium DNA methylation data

Ziemann, M.; Abeysooriya, M.; Bora, A.; Lamon, S.; Kasu, M. S.; Norris, M. W.; Wong, Y. T.; Craig, J. M.

2024-02-24 genomics
10.1101/2024.02.22.581670 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Infinium Methylation BeadChip arrays remain one of the most popular platforms for epigenome-wide association studies, but tools for downstream pathway analysis have their limitations. Functional class scoring (FCS) is a group of pathway enrichment techniques that involve the ranking of genes and evaluation of their collective regulation in biological systems, but the implementations described for Infinium methylation array data do not retain direction information, which is important for mechanistic understanding of genomic regulation. Here, we evaluate several candidate FCS methods that retain directional information. According to simulation results, the best-performing method involves the mean aggregation of probe limma t-statistics by gene followed by a rank-ANOVA enrichment test using the mitch package. This method, which we call "LAM", outperformed an existing over-representation analysis method in simulations, and showed higher sensitivity and robustness in an analysis of real lung tumour-normal paired datasets. Using matched RNA-seq data we examine the relationship of methylation differences at promoters and gene bodies with RNA expression at the level of pathways in lung cancer. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we apply it to three other contexts where public data were available. Firstly, we examine differential pathway methylation associated with chronological age. Secondly, we investigate pathway methylation differences in infants conceived with in vitro fertilisation. Lastly, we analyse differential pathway methylation in 19 disease states, identifying hundreds of novel associations. These results show LAM is a powerful method for the detection of differential pathway methylation as compared to existing methods. A reproducible vignette is provided to illustrate how to implement this method.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epigenetics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.3%
2
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
9.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Clinical Epigenetics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
6
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
7
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
8
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
10
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Genetic Epidemiology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Epigenomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.7%
14
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
16
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
22
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
26
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
27
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Molecular Omics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%