The evolution of antimicrobial peptide resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is severely constrained by random peptide mixtures
Antunes, B.; Zanchi, C.; Maron, B.; Witzany, C.; Regoes, R. R.; Hayouka, Z.; Rolff, J.
Show abstract
The prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens has become a major threat to public health, requiring swift initiatives for discovering new strategies to control bacterial infections. Hence, antibiotic stewardship and rapid diagnostics, but also the development, and prudent use, of novel effective antimicrobial agents are paramount. Ideally, these agents should be less likely to select for resistance in pathogens than currently available conventional antimicrobials. The usage of antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs), key components of the innate immune response, and combination therapies, have been proposed as strategies to diminish the emergence of resistance. Herein, we investigated whether newly developed random antimicrobial peptide mixtures (RPMs) can significantly reduce the risk of resistance evolution in vitro to that of single sequence AMPs, using the ESKAPE pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) as a model Gram-negative bacterium. Infections of this pathogen are difficult to treat due the inherent resistance to many drug classes, enhanced by the capacity to form biofilms. P. aeruginosa was experimentally evolved in the presence of AMPs or RPMs, subsequentially assessing the extent of resistance evolution and cross-resistance/collateral sensitivity between treatments. Furthermore, the fitness costs of resistance on bacterial growth were studied, and whole-genome sequencing used to investigate which mutations could be candidates for causing resistant phenotypes. Lastly, changes in the pharmacodynamics of the evolved bacterial strains were examined. Our findings suggest that using RPMs bears a much lower risk of resistance evolution compared to AMPs and mostly prevents cross-resistance development to other treatments, while maintaining (or even improving) drug sensitivity. This strengthens the case for using random cocktails of AMPs in favour of single AMPs, against which resistance evolved in vitro, further providing an alternative to classic antibiotics worth pursuing.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Selective pressure by rifampicin modulates mutation rates and evolutionary trajectories of mycobacterial genomes 96%
- SET-M33 peptide as a selective in vitro antimicrobial agent against the porcine respiratory pathogen Glaesserella parasuis 95%
- Gallocin A, an atypical two-peptide bacteriocin with intramolecular disulfide bonds required for activity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing synergistic drug combinations to restore antibiotic sensitivity in drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis 94%
- Variability in intrinsic drug tolerance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis corresponds with phylogenetic lineage 94%
- Transcriptomics reveals how minocycline-colistin synergy overcomes antibiotic resistance in multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ceragenins and antimicrobial peptides kill bacteria through distinct mechanisms 95%
- Beyond self-resistance: ABCF ATPase LmrC is a signal-transducing component of an antibiotic-driven signaling cascade hastening the onset of lincomycin biosynthesis 94%
- The fitness landscape of TEM-1 β-lactamase is stratified and inverted by sublethal concentrations of cefotaxime 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-feeding modulates the rate and mechanism of antibiotic resistance evolution in a model microbial community of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica 95%
- Prevalence and mechanisms of high-level carbapenem antibiotic tolerance in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae 94%
- Experimental evolution of a pathogen confronted with innate immune memory increases variation in virulence 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.