Escape from X inactivation is directly modulated by levels of Xist non-coding RNA
Hauth, A.; Panten, J.; Kneuss, E.; Picard, C.; Servant, N.; Rall, I.; Perez-Rico, Y. A.; Clerquin, L.; Servaas, N.; Villacorta, L.; Jung, F.; Luong, C.; Chang, H. Y.; Stegle, O.; Odom, D. T.; Loda, A.; heard, E.
Show abstract
In placental females, one copy of the two X chromosomes is largely silenced during a narrow developmental time window, in a process mediated by the non-coding RNA Xist 1. Here, we demonstrate that Xist can initiate X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) well beyond early embryogenesis. By modifying its endogenous level, we show that Xist has the capacity to actively silence genes that escape XCI both in neuronal progenitor cells (NPCs) and in vivo, in mouse embryos. We also show that Xist plays a direct role in eliminating TAD-like structures associated with clusters of escapee genes on the inactive X chromosome, and that this is dependent on Xists XCI initiation partner, SPEN 2. We further demonstrate that Xists function in suppressing gene expression of escapees and topological domain formation is reversible for up to seven days post-induction, but that sustained Xist up-regulation leads to progressively irreversible silencing and CpG island DNA methylation of facultative escapees. Thus, the distinctive transcriptional and regulatory topologies of the silenced X chromosome is actively, directly - and reversibly - controlled by Xist RNA throughout life.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DNMT3A-dependent DNA methylation is required for spermatogonial stem cells to commit to spermatogenesis 97%
- Dynamic network-guided CRISPRi screen reveals CTCF loop-constrained nonlinear enhancer-gene regulatory activity in cell state transitions 97%
- Genome-wide CRISPR screens identify PTGES3 as a novel AR modulator 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.