Back

Habitat isolation diminishes potential of self-organised pattern formation to promote local diversity in metacommunities

Philipp, L.; Klauschies, T.; Guill, C.

2024-02-23 ecology
10.1101/2024.02.22.581536 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Progressive destruction and isolation of natural habitat is a major threat to biodiversity worldwide. In this study we use a trophic metacommunity model with complex, spatially explicit structure to address how the interaction of local and regional processes affects the functional diversity of autotroph (producer) communities within and between individual habitat patches. One important driver of biodiversity in metacommunities is spatial heterogeneity of the environment, as it enables source-sink dynamics between patches. Besides a-priori differences in the environmental conditions, heterogeneous distributions of resources and species biomasses can also emerge through self-organised pattern formation caused by scale-dependent feedback between local trophic and regional dispersal dynamics. We show that this emergent heterogeneity can enhance the functional diversity of local autotroph communities by jointly strengthening source-sink dynamics and reducing stabilising selection pressure. Our results indicate that this effect is particularly strong in highly connected metacommunities, while metacommunity size (number of patches) alone plays a lesser role. We demonstrate that the positive effect on local diversity is driven by an eco-evo-spatial feedback loop that is fueled by the asynchronous biomass- and trait dynamics between the patches created by self-organised pattern formation. In highly connected metacommunities, oscillatory biomass patterns with particularly large amplitude strengthen this feedback loop. Our findings are highly relevant in the light of anthropogenic habitat changes that often destroy dispersal pathways, thereby increasing habitat isolation, lowering overall connectance of metacommunities and ultimately threatening the biodiversity in local habitats. Only a joint investigation of the contributing ecological, evolutionary, and spatial mechanisms in complex model systems can yield comprehensive understanding of these processes, allowing for the development of strategies to mitigate adverse anthropogenic influence.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.8%
2
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.0%
4
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.6%
5
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
6
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
9
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
10
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
12
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
14
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
18
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%