Directed neural interactions in fMRI: a comparison between Granger Causality and Effective Connectivity
Allegra, M.; Gilson, M.; Brovelli, A.
Show abstract
Understanding how neural populations interact is crucial to understand brain function. Most common approaches to infer neural interactions are based on Granger causality (GC) analyses and effective connectivity (EC) models of neural time series. However, an in-depth investigation of the similarity and complementarity of these approaches is currently lacking. GC and EC are classically thought to provide complementary information about the interdependence between neural signals. Whereas GC quantifies the amount of predictability between time series and it is interpreted as a measure of information flow, EC quantifies the amount and sign of the interaction, and it is often interpreted as the causal influence that a neural unit exert over another. Here, we show that, in the context of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data analysis and first-order autoregressive models, GC and EC share common assumptions and are mathematically related. More precisely, by defining a corrected version of GC accounting for unequal noise variances affecting the source and target node, we show that the two measures are linked by an approximately quadratic relation, where positive or negative values of EC are associated with identical values of GC. While the relation is obtained in limit of infinite sampling time, we use simulations to show that it can be observed in finite data samples as classically observed in neuroimaging studies, provided sufficiently long sampling, multiple sessions or group averaging. Finally, we compare the GC and EC analyses on fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project, and obtain results consistent with simulation outcomes. While GC and EC analyses do not provide reliable estimates at the single subject or single connection level, they become stable at the group level (more than approximately 20 subjects), where the predicted relation between GC and EC can be clearly observed from the data. To conclude, our study provides a common mathematical framework to make grounded methodological choices in the reconstruction and analysis of directed brain networks from neuroimaging time series.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Scale-resolved analysis of brain functional connectivity networks with spectral entropy 98%
- Emergence of Canonical Functional Networks from the Structural Connectome 97%
- Multi-Subject Stochastic Blockmodels for Adaptive Analysis of Individual Differences in Human Brain Network Cluster Structure. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- On the edge of criticality: strength-dependent perturbation unveils delicate balance between fluctuation and oscillation in brain dynamics 97%
- DySCo: a general framework for dynamic Functional Connectivity 96%
- Robust point-process Granger causality analysis in presence of exogenous temporal modulations and trial-by-trial variability in spike trains. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Higher-order connectomics of human brain function reveals local topological signatures of task decoding, individual identification, and behavior 95%
- High-level cognition during story listening is reflected in high-order dynamic correlations in neural activity patterns 95%
- Enhanced brain structure-function tethering in transmodal cortex revealed by high-frequency eigenmodes 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.