Back

Protection of natural infection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 variant

Chemaitelly, H.; Coyle, P.; Kacem, M. A. B.; Ayoub, H.; Tang, P.; Hasan, M. R.; YASSINE, H. M.; Althani, A.; Al-Kanaani, Z.; Al-Kuwari, E.; Jeremijenko, A.; Kaleeckal, A. H.; Latif, A. N.; Shaik, R. M.; Abdul-Rahim, H. F.; Nasrallah, G.; Al-Kuwari, M. G.; Butt, A. A.; Al-Romaihi, H. E.; Al-Thani, M. H.; Al-Khal, A.; Bertollini, R.; Abu-Raddad, L. J.

2024-02-23 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.02.22.24303193 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of natural infection in preventing reinfection with the JN.1 variant during a large JN.1 wave in Qatar, using a test-negative case-control study design. The overall effectiveness of previous infection in preventing reinfection with JN.1 was estimated at only 1.8% (95% CI: -9.3-12.6%). This effectiveness demonstrated a rapid decline over time since the previous infection, decreasing from 82.4% (95% CI: 40.9-94.7%) within 3 to less than 6 months after the previous infection to 50.9% (95% CI: -11.8-78.7%) in the subsequent 3 months, and further dropping to 18.3% (95% CI: -34.6-56.3%) in the subsequent 3 months. Ultimately, it reached a negligible level after one year. The findings show that the protection of natural infection against reinfection with JN.1 is strong only among those who were infected within the last 6 months, with variants such as XBB*. However, this protection wanes rapidly and is entirely lost one year after the previous infection. The findings support considerable immune evasion by JN.1.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.