Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme commissioning 2020-2023: associations with patient experience and QOF
Penfold, C. M.; Hong, J.; Edwards, P. J.; Kashyap, M.; Salisbury, C.; Bennett, B.; Macleod, J.; Redaniel, M. T.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) was introduced by NHS England in 2020 alongside Primary Care Networks (PCNs) with aims of increasing the workforce and improving patient outcomes. AimDescribe the uptake of direct-patient care (DPC)-ARRS roles and its impact on patients experiences. Design and SettingEcological study using 2020-2023 PCN and Practice workforce data, registered patient characteristics, the General Practice Patient Survey, and the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). MethodsDescriptive statistics with associations examined using quantile and linear regression. ResultsBy March 2023, 17,588 FTE DPC-ARRS roles were commissioned by 1,223 PCNs. PCNs with fewer constituent practices had more DPC-ARRS roles per population (p<0.001) as did PCNs with more FTE GPs per population (p=0.005). DPC-ARRS commissioning did not vary with age, proportion female or deprivation of practice populations. DPC-ARRS roles were associated with small increases in patient satisfaction (0.8 percentage points increase in patients satisfied per one DPC-ARRS FTE) and perceptions of access (0.7 percentage points increase in patients reporting good experience of making an appointment per one DPC-ARRS FTE), but not with overall QOF achievement. ConclusionsThe commissioning of DPC-ARRS roles was associated with small increases in patient satisfaction and perceptions of access, but not with QOF achievement. DPC-ARRS roles were employed in areas with more GPs rather than compensating for a shortage of doctors. Single practice PCNs commissioned more roles per registered population, which may be advantageous to single practice PCNs. Further evaluation of the scheme is warranted. How this fits inO_LIPrimary Care Networks (PCNs) commissioning of non-GP direct-patient care (DPC) roles via the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) has expanded rapidly, with an allocated budget of {pound}110m in 2019/2020 employing 279 full time equivalent (FTE) DPC-ARRS staff in March 2020, to {pound}1,027m in 2022/2023, employing 17,588 FTE DPC-ARRS staff in March 2023. C_LIO_LIPrevious research, using NHS England data prior to 2020, had reported associations between increased Healthcare Associate Professionals employment and reductions in patient satisfaction and perceptions of access, with no impact on Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) achievement, but it was not known if these trends remained after the implementation of ARRS. C_LIO_LIThis study found a small increase in both overall patient satisfaction and perceptions of access, which equates to approximately 240-400 patients satisfied with their care and 210-350 patients able to make appointments for each FTE in ARRS roles employed in a typical PCN (30,000-50,000 patients), but no association with overall QOF achievement. C_LIO_LIFurther evaluation is required to identify if the observed associations can be attributed to the ARRS roll-out and if this represents value for money. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Primary care transformation in Scotland: a comparison two cross-sectional national surveys of general practitioners’ views in 2018 and 2023 97%
- General practitioner workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review 94%
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 93%
- Primary care use of laboratory tests in Northern Ireland Western Health and Social Care Trust: a cross-sectional study 93%
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the Tool for Advancing Practice Performance, a practice-level survey to assess primary care structures and processes 93%
- COVI-Prim survey: Challenges for Austrian and German general practitioners during initial phase of COVID-19 93%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatio-temporal modelling of referrals to outpatient respiratory clinics in the integrated care system of the Morecambe Bay area, England 93%
- Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net 93%
- Access to personal protective equipment in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: results from a nationwide cohort study (UK-REACH) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.