Back

Changes in bird migration phenology over one century: a perspective from the Neotropical non-breeding grounds

Gutierrez-Carrillo, D. A.; Mateus-Aguilar, B.; Gomez, C.; Cadena, D.

2024-02-23 ecology
10.1101/2024.02.21.581429 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Changes in the migration phenology of birds linked to global change are extensively documented. Longitudinal studies from temperate breeding grounds have mostly shown earlier arrivals in the spring and a variety of patterns during fall migration 1,2, yet no studies have addressed whether and how migration phenology has changed using data from the tropical non-breeding grounds. Understanding whether changes in migratory phenology are also evident in non-breeding sites is essential to determine the underlying causes of patterns documented in breeding areas. Using data from historical scientific collections and modern repositories of community-science records, we assessed changes in migration phenology of 12 Nearctic-Neotropical long-distance migratory birds in Colombia over six decades. We also explored whether shared breeding and non-breeding climatic niches explained variation in phenological patterns observed among species. All species showed shifts in spring (range -37 - 9 days from peak passage date) or fall (range -26 - 36 days) migration, but patterns differed among species in ways partly attributable to shared breeding or wintering climatic niches. Our results, although not yet broadly generalizable, suggest that birds use cues to time their migration at their non-breeding grounds which are most likely different to those they use on their breeding grounds. To better understand the effects of global change on biodiversity, exploring the underlying drivers of phenological changes with further research integrating more long-term datasets available through scientific collections and community science platforms should be a priority.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.