Back

Risk of subsequent primary cancers among adult cancer survivors in Alberta

Warkentin, M. T.; Brenner, D. R.; Cheung, W. Y.; O'Sullivan, D. E.

2024-02-23 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.02.21.24303162 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundImprovements in cancer control have led to a drastic increase in cancer survivors who may be at an elevated risk of developing a subsequent primary cancer (SPC). In this study, we assessed the risk and patterns of SPC development among 134,693 adult cancer survivors in Alberta, Canada. MethodsWe used data from the Alberta Cancer Registry to identify all first primary cancers (FPC) occurring between 2004 and 2015. A SPC was considered as the next primary cancer occurring in a different site. We estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for SPC development as the observed number of SPC (O) divided by the expected number of SPC (E), where E is a weighted-sum of the population-based year-age-sex-specific incidence rates and the corresponding person-years of follow-up. ResultsThe risk of developing a SPC up to fifteen years after an initial cancer was 16.1% for males and 12.3% for females, though these estimates vary considerably by cancer site. Survivors of initial head and neck cancers had a 21.3% fifteen-year cumulative incidence and a 2.5-fold relative risk of SPC development. Overall, both males (SIR=1.50) and females (SIR=1.64) had an increased risk of a SPC. There were significant increases in SPC risk for nearly all age groups, with a greater than 5-fold increase for survivors of cancers diagnosed between ages 18-39. ConclusionsCancer survivors of nearly every FPC site had substantially increased risk of a SPC, compared to the cancer risk in the general population. Screen-detectable cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung) were common SPC sites and highlights the need to investigate optimal strategies for screening the growing population of cancer survivors.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.