Prospective study of machine learning for identification of high-risk COVID-19 patients
Frausto-Avila, C. M.; Leon-Montiel, R. d. J.; Quiroz-Juarez, M. A.; U'Ren, A. B.
10.1101/2024.02.21.24303159 medRxivShow abstract
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic constituted a public health crisis with a devastating effect in terms of its death toll and effects on the world economy. Notably, machine learning methods have played a pivotal role in devising novel technological solutions designed to tackle challenges brought forth by this pandemic. In particular, tools for the rapid identification of high-risk COVID-19 patients have been developed to aid in the effective allocation of hospital resources and for containing the spread of the virus. A comprehensive validation of such intelligent technological approaches is needed to ascertain their clinical utility; importantly, it may help develop future strategies for efficient patient classification to be used in future viral outbreaks. Here we present a prospective study to evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art machine-learning models proposed in PloS one 16, e0257234 (2021), which we developed for the identification of high-risk COVID-19 patients across four identified clinical stages. The model relies on artificial neural networks trained with historical patient data from Mexico. To assess their predictive capabilities across the six, registered, epidemiological waves of COVID-19 infection in Mexico, we measure the accuracy within each wave without retraining the neural networks. We then compare their performance against neural networks trained with cumulative historical data up to the end of each wave. Our findings indicate that models trained using early historical data exhibit strong predictive capabilities, which allows us to accurately identify high-risk patients in subsequent epidemiological waves--under clearly varying vaccination, prevalent viral strain, and medical treatment conditions. These results show that artificial intelligence-based methods for patient classification can be robust throughout an extended period characterized by constantly evolving conditions, and represent a potentially powerful tool for tackling future pandemic events, particularly for clinical outcome prediction of individual patients.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mitigating Machine Learning Bias Between High Income and Low-Middle Income Countries for Enhanced Model Fairness and Generalizability 95%
- Extended compartmental model for modeling COVID-19 epidemic in Slovenia 95%
- Model Based Estimation of the SARS-CoV-2 Immunization Level in Austria and Consequences for Herd Immunity Effects 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The influence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern on national case fatality rates 93%
- Improving Tuberculosis Detection in Chest X-ray Images through Transfer Learning and Deep Learning: A Comparative Study of CNN Architectures 92%
- Prediction of COVID-19 Mortality to Support Patient Prognosis and Triage and Limits of Current Open-Source Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Harnessing multi-output machine learning approach and dynamical observables from network structure to optimize COVID-19 intervention strategies 96%
- Modeling the impact of the Omicron infection wave in Germany 92%
- Linking Patient Records at Scale with a Hybrid Approach Combining Contrastive Learning and Deterministic Rules 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.