A Model-agnostic Computational Method for Discovering Gene-Phenotype Relationships and Inferring Gene Networks via in silico Gene Perturbation
Stojsin, R.; Chen, X.; Zhao, Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundDeep learning architectures have advanced genotype-phenotype mappings with precision but often obscure the roles of specific genes and their interactions. Our research introduces a model-agnostic computational methodology, capitalizing on the analytical strengths of deep learning models to serve as biological proxies, enabling interpretation of key gene interactions and their impact on phenotypic outcomes. The objective of this research is to refine the understanding of genetic networks in complex traits by leveraging the nuanced decision-making of advanced models. ResultsTesting was conducted across several computational models representing varying levels of complexity trained on gene expression datasets for the prediction of the Ki-67 biomarker, which is known for its prognostic value in breast cancer. The methodology is capable of using models as proxies to identify biologically significant genes and to infer relevant gene networks from an entirely data-driven analysis. Notably, the model-derived biomarkers (p-values of 0.013 and 0.003) outperformed the conventional Ki-67 biomarker (0.021) in terms of prognostic efficacy. Moreover, our analysis revealed high congruence between model precision and the biological relevance of the genes and gene relationships identified. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the complexity of the identified gene relationships was consistent with the decision-making intricacy of the model, with complex models capturing greater proportions of complex gene-gene interactions (61.2% and 31.1%) than simpler models (4.6%), reinforcing that the approach effectively captures biologically relevant in-model decision-making processes. ConclusionsThis methodology offers researchers a powerful tool to examine the decision-making processes within their genotype-phenotype mapping models. It accurately identifies critical genes and their interactions, revealing the biological rationale behind model decisions. It also enables comparisons of decision-making between different models. Furthermore, by discovering in-model critical gene networks, our approach helps bridge the gap between research and clinical applications. It facilitates the translation of complex, model-driven genetic discoveries into actionable clinical insights. This capability is pivotal for advancing personalized medicine, as it leverages the precision of deep learning models to uncover biologically relevant genes and gene networks and opens pathways for discovering new gene biomarker combinations and previously unknown gene interactions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Model guided trait-specific co-expression network estimation as a new perspective for identifying molecular interactions and pathways 95%
- Analyzing cancer gene expression data through the lens of normal tissue-specificity 95%
- Exploring tumor-normal cross-talk with TranNet: role of the environment in tumor progression 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel ratio-metric features enable the identification of new driver genes across cancer types 95%
- DeepInsight-3D for precision oncology: an improved anti-cancer drug response prediction from high-dimensional multi-omics data with convolutional neural networks 95%
- Finding disease modules for cancer and COVID-19 in gene co-expression networks with the Core&Peel method 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliable machine learning models in genomic medicine using conformal prediction 93%
- BC-Predict: Mining of signal biomarkers and multilevel validation of cascade classifier for early-stage breast cancer subtyping and prognosis 93%
- Bacteriocin Prediction Through Cross-Validation-Based and Hypergraph-Based Feature Evaluation Approaches 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- New analysis framework incorporating mixed mutual information and scalable Bayesian networks for multimodal high dimensional genomic and epigenomic cancer data 96%
- A Network-centric Framework for theEvaluation of Mutual Exclusivity Tests onCancer Drivers 94%
- The Impact of Pathway Database Choice on Statistical Enrichment Analysis and Predictive Modeling 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.