Inconsistent Music-Based Intervention Reporting in Dementia Studies: A Systematic Mapping Review
Lepping, R. J.; Hess, B. J.; Taylor, J. J.; Hanson-Abromeit, D.; Williams, K. N.
Show abstract
Recent research has shown beneficial results for music-based interventions (MBIs) for persons living with Alzheimers disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD), but reports often lack sufficient detail about the MBI methodology, which reduces replicability. A detailed checklist for best practices in how to report MBIs was created in 2011 by Robb and colleagues to remedy the lack of detail in MBI descriptions. The implementation of the checklist specifically in AD/ADRD research has not been established. Given the complexity of music and the variety of uses for research and health, specific MBI descriptions are necessary for rigorous replication and validation of study results. This systematic mapping review utilized the "Checklist for Reporting Music-Based Interventions" to evaluate the current state of MBI descriptive specificity in AD/ADRD research. Research articles testing MBIs and reviews of MBI efficacy published between January 2015 and August 2023 were scored using the checklist and the results were summarized. Nineteen studies were screened, and reporting was inconsistent across the 11 checklist criteria. Six out of 19 studies fully reported more than 5 of the 11 criteria. Only one of the 11 scoring criteria was at least partially reported across all 19 studies. Thorough reporting of intervention detail for MBIs remains limited in AD/ADRD MBI research. This impedes study validation, replication, and slows the progress of research and potential application of music in practice. Greater implementation of the reporting guidelines provided by Robb and colleagues would move the field of MBI research for AD/ADRD forward more quickly and efficiently.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility of Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cognitive Remediation: A Systematic Review 94%
- Top-funded digital health companies offering lifestyle interventions for dementia prevention: Company overview and evidence analysis 93%
- Randomized Clinical Trial of ICECaP (Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia): Primary Mental Health and Burden Outcomes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Memory for Music (M4M) protocol for an international randomized controlled trial: Effects of individual intensive musical training based on singing in non-musicians with Alzheimer's disease 94%
- Digital game-based interventions for cognitive training in healthy adults and adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a two-part systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use – a scoping review 91%
- Methods used to select results to include in meta-analyses of nutrition research: a meta-research study 91%
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 94%
- The Helping Older People Engage (HOPE) Study: Protocol & COVID Modifications for a Randomized Trial 91%
- Erroneous risks in pharmaceutical versus non-pharmaceutical interventions during data extraction in evidence synthesis practice: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.