Back

Inconsistent Music-Based Intervention Reporting in Dementia Studies: A Systematic Mapping Review

Lepping, R. J.; Hess, B. J.; Taylor, J. J.; Hanson-Abromeit, D.; Williams, K. N.

2024-02-23 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2024.02.21.24303087 medRxiv
Show abstract

Recent research has shown beneficial results for music-based interventions (MBIs) for persons living with Alzheimers disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD), but reports often lack sufficient detail about the MBI methodology, which reduces replicability. A detailed checklist for best practices in how to report MBIs was created in 2011 by Robb and colleagues to remedy the lack of detail in MBI descriptions. The implementation of the checklist specifically in AD/ADRD research has not been established. Given the complexity of music and the variety of uses for research and health, specific MBI descriptions are necessary for rigorous replication and validation of study results. This systematic mapping review utilized the "Checklist for Reporting Music-Based Interventions" to evaluate the current state of MBI descriptive specificity in AD/ADRD research. Research articles testing MBIs and reviews of MBI efficacy published between January 2015 and August 2023 were scored using the checklist and the results were summarized. Nineteen studies were screened, and reporting was inconsistent across the 11 checklist criteria. Six out of 19 studies fully reported more than 5 of the 11 criteria. Only one of the 11 scoring criteria was at least partially reported across all 19 studies. Thorough reporting of intervention detail for MBIs remains limited in AD/ADRD MBI research. This impedes study validation, replication, and slows the progress of research and potential application of music in practice. Greater implementation of the reporting guidelines provided by Robb and colleagues would move the field of MBI research for AD/ADRD forward more quickly and efficiently.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.