Back

Risk of Adverse Events Following Monovalent Third or Booster Dose of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in U.S. Adults Ages 18 Years and Older

Shoaibi, A.; Matuska, K.; Lloyd, P. C.; Wong, H. L.; Gruber, J. F.; Clarke, T. C.; Cho, S.; Lassman, E.; Lyu, H.; McEvoy, R.; Wan, Z.; Hu, M.; Akhtar, S.; Jiao, Y.; Chillarige, Y.; Beachler, D.; Secora, A.; Selvam, N.; Djibo, D. A.; McMahill Walraven, C. N.; Seeger, J. D.; Amend, K. L.; Song, J. N.; Clifford, R.; Kelman, J. A.; Forshee, R. A.; Anderson, S. A.

2024-02-27 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.02.20.24303089 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe U.S. FDA authorized the monovalent third primary series or booster doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in August 2021 for persons 18 years and older. Monitoring of outcomes following updated authorizations is critical to evaluate vaccine safety and can provide early detection of rare adverse events (AEs) not identified in pre-licensure trials. MethodsWe evaluated the risk of 17 AEs following third doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines from August 2021 through early 2022 among adults aged 18-64 years in three commercial databases (Optum, Carelon Research, CVS Health) and adults aged >65 years in Medicare Fee-For-Service. We compared observed AE incidence rates to historical (expected) rates prior to the pandemic, estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for the Medicare database and pooled IRR across the three commercial databases. Analyses were also stratified by prior history of COVID-19 diagnosis. Estimates exceeding a pre-defined threshold were considered statistical signals. ResultsFour AEs met the threshold for statistical signals for BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines including Bells Palsy and pulmonary embolism in Medicare, and anaphylaxis and myocarditis/pericarditis in commercial databases. Nine AEs and three AEs signaled among adults with and without prior COVID-19 diagnosis, respectively. ConclusionsThis early monitoring study identified statistical signals for AEs following third doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Since this method is intended for screening purposes and generates crude results, results do not establish a causal association between the vaccines and AEs. FDAs public health assessment remains consistent that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the risks of vaccination.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.4%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
5
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
8
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%