Back

Personalized circuit modeling captures variation in cortical functional connectivity

Cooper, R. A.; Demirtas, M.; Burt, J. B.; Howell, A. M.; Ji, J. L.; Repovs, G.; Sotiropoulos, S.; Anticevic, A.; Murray, J. D.

2024-02-20 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.02.19.581085 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the human cortex reveals patterns of correlated neural dynamics that are individual-specific and associated with phenotypic variation. However, circuit mechanisms underlying individual variation in functional connectivity (FC) are not well understood. Here, we fit individual-level FC patterns with a biophysically-based circuit model of large-scale cortical dynamics. This model is fit with a small number of neurophysiologically interpretable parameters, and incorporates a hierarchical gradient in local synaptic strengths across cortex parameterized via the structural MRI-derived T1w/T2w map. We applied our modeling framework to resting-state fMRI FC from a large cohort of subjects (N=842) from the Human Connectome Project. We found that the model captures a substantial portion of individual variation in FC, especially with personalized degrees of local synaptic specialization along the hierarchical gradient. Furthermore, the model can capture to the within-subject variation in FC across scans. Empirically, we found that principal modes of individual variation in FC follow interpretable topographic patterns. We developed a framework to assess model expressivity via how these empirical modes of FC variation align with variations in simulated FC induced by parameter perturbations. This framework reveals a straightforward mapping between key parameters and the leading modes of variation across subjects and provides a principled approach to extending computational models. Collectively, our modeling results establish a foundation for personalized computational modeling of functional dynamics in large-scale brain circuits.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.