Elevated plasma neurofilament light & glial fibrillary acidic protein in epilepsy versus non-epileptic seizures & non-epileptic disorders
Dobson, H.; Al Maawali, S.; Malpas, C. B.; Santillo, A. F.; Kang, M.; Todaro, M.; Watson, R.; Yassi, N.; Blennow, K.; Zetterberg, H.; Foster, E.; Neal, A.; Velakoulis, D.; O'Brien, T.; Eratne, D.; Kwan, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundResearch suggests that recurrent seizures may lead to neuronal injury. Neurofilament light chain protein (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels increase in cerebrospinal fluid and blood following neuroaxonal damage, and have been hypothesised as potential biomarkers for epilepsy. We examined plasma NfL and GFAP levels and their diagnostic utility in differentiating patients with epilepsy from those with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), and other non-epileptic disorders. MethodsWe recruited consecutive adults admitted for video-electroencephalography monitoring and formal neuropsychiatric assessment. Plasma samples were collected on admission. NfL and GFAP levels were quantified and compared between patient groups and an age-matched reference cohort (n=1,926), and correlated with clinical variables. Results149 patients were included. 115 were diagnosed with epilepsy, 22 with PNES and 12 with other conditions. Plasma NfL and GFAP levels were elevated in patients with epilepsy compared to PNES, adjusted for age and sex (NfL p=0.004, GFAP p=0.004). A significantly higher proportion of patients with epilepsy (26%) had NfL levels above the 95th age-matched percentile compared to the reference cohort (5%; p=0.0265). NfL levels above the 95th percentile of the reference cohort had a 97% positive predictive value for epilepsy. DiscussionElevated NfL or GFAP levels may support an underlying epilepsy diagnosis and caution against a diagnosis of PNES alone. Further examination of associations between NfL and GFAP levels and specific epilepsy subtypes or seizure characteristics may provide valuable insights into disease heterogeneity and contribute to the refinement of diagnosis, understanding pathophysiological mechanisms, and formulating treatment approaches.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Volumetric and microstructural abnormalities of the amygdala in focal epilepsy with varied levels of SUDEP risk 94%
- Distinct psychopathology profiles in patients with epileptic seizures compared to non-epileptic psychogenic seizures 93%
- Acute Seizures After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage In Young Individuals: 11-Year Trends And Association With Mortality 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effectiveness of Cenobamate in patients previously treated with Vagus Nerve Stimulation for drug resistant epilepsy 94%
- Thalamohippocampal atrophy in focal epilepsy of unknown cause at the time of diagnosis 93%
- Real-world smartphone data can trace the behavioural impact of epilepsy: A Case study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.