Electrode positioning errors reduce current dose for focal tDCS set-ups: Evidence from individualized electric field mapping
Niemann, F.; Riemann, S.; Hubert, A.-K.; Antonenko, D.; Thielscher, A.; Martin, A. K.; Unger, N.; Flöel, A.; Meinzer, M. F.
Show abstract
ObjectiveElectrode positioning errors contribute to variability of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects. We investigated the impact of electrode positioning errors on current flow for tDCS set-ups with different focality. MethodsDeviations from planned electrode positions were determined using data acquired in an experimental study (N=240 datasets) that administered conventional and focal tDCS during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Comparison of individualized electric field modeling for planned and empirically derived "actual" electrode positions was conducted to quantify the impact of positioning errors on the electric field dose in target regions for tDCS. ResultsPlanned electrode positions resulted in higher current dose in the target regions for focal compared to conventional montages (7-12%). Deviations from planned positions significantly reduced current flow in the target regions, selectively for focal set-ups (26-30%). Dose reductions were significantly larger for focal compared to conventional set-ups (29-43%). ConclusionsPrecise positioning is crucial when using focal tDCS set-ups to avoid significant reductions of current dose in the intended target regions. SignificanceOur results highlight the urgent need to routinely implement methods for improving electrode positioning, minimization of electrode drift, verification of electrode positions before and/or after tDCS and also to consider positioning errors when investigating dose-response relationships, especially for focal set-ups.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of tDCS Dose and Electrode Montage on regional cerebral blood flow and motor behavior 98%
- tDCS modulates effective connectivity during motor command following; a potential therapeutic target for disorders of consciousness 95%
- State-dependent effectiveness of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical excitability 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extracting Reproducible Components from Electroencephalographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Group Task-Related Component Analysis 95%
- Electric field based dosing for TMS 95%
- Characterising the contribution of auditory and somatosensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials following stimulation of prefrontal, premotor and parietal cortex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- 40 Hz Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials Recovered During Oscillating Transcranial Electrical Stimulation 95%
- Biophysical modeling of the electric field magnitude and distribution induced by electrical stimulation with intracerebral electrodes 92%
- EPOC outside the shield: comparing the performance of a consumer-grade EEG device in shielded and unshielded environments. 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- TI-Toolbox: An Open-Source Software for Temporal Interference Stimulation Research 95%
- Transferability of cathodal tDCS effects from the primary motor to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a multimodal TMS-EEG study 95%
- Transcranial direct current stimulation elevates the baseline activity while sharpening the spatial tuning of the human visual cortex 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Modulate fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity in Methamphetamine Users: A Randomized Clinical Trial 94%
- Are we really targeting and stimulating DLPFC by placing transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) electrodes over F3/F4? 94%
- In the back of your mind: Cortical mapping of paraspinal afferent inputs 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.