Back

Adaptation of human cell populations to different levels of centriole amplification involves a two-step response

Dias Louro, M. A.; Peneda, C.; Bank, C.; Bettencourt Dias, M.

2024-02-16 cell biology
10.1101/2024.02.15.580424 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Centrioles are the main components of cilia and centrosomes, which play a central role in cell division and signalling. Their numbers are strictly regulated. Centriole amplification, or the presence of extra centrioles, often occurs in tumours and leads to aneuploidy and altered signalling and has been associated with cancer development and malignancy. Negative selection of cells with extra centrioles prevents numerical errors from expanding in the population, resulting in an overproduction-selection balance. However, how chronic perturbation of key centriolar regulators affects centriole number dynamics is poorly described. PLK4, a key regulator of centriole biogenesis, is often overexpressed in cancer. Here, we studied the long-term dynamics of cell populations exposed to different levels of PLK4 overexpression. We measured absolute and relative fitness in the evolving populations, quantified centriole numbers over time, as well as various aspects of the immediate response to centriole amplification. Our experiments indicated negative selection against cells with extra centrioles and outcompetition of PLK4-overexpressing cells by a cell line carrying a truncated form of PLK4, that does not amplify centrioles. In populations where cells carrying the truncated form of PLK4 were absent, cells overexpressing full-length PLK4 maintained the capacity to amplify centrioles over the course of experimental evolution and, strikingly, converge to the same degree of centriole amplification regardless of the level of PLK4 overexpression. Our results support a population-level response to centrosome amplification to control centriole amplification levels. Future work is necessary to further characterise this response and the mechanisms that allow cell populations to maintain centriole amplification.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
4
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
5
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
6
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
7
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
8
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
12
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Cell Cycle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
19
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
23
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
27
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
30
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%