Back

Tuning a mechanical model to biological reality: A case study in the LaMSA system of the trap-jaw ant Strumigenys

Anderson, P. S. L.; Jorge, J. F.; Crofts, S. B.; Castro, J. T.; Didcock, R. L.; Cook, A.; Larabee, F. J.; Ilton, M.

2024-02-20 biophysics
10.1101/2024.02.15.580213 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the relationship between morphology and movement in biomechanical systems, particularly those composed of multiple complex elements, presents challenges due to the nonlinear nature of the interaction between components. This study focuses on the mandibular closing mechanisms in ants, specifically comparing muscle-driven actuation (MDA) and latch-mediated spring actuation (LaMSA) in the genus Strumigenys. Analyzing 3D structural data from diverse Strumigenys species, we employ mathematical models for both LaMSA and MDA systems. Our findings reveal distinct patterns of mechanical sensitivity between the two models, with sensitivity varying across kinematic output metrics. We explore the performance transition between MDA and LaMSA systems by incorporating biological data and correlations between morphological parameters into the models. In these models tuned specifically to Strumigenys, we find the LaMSA mechanism outperforms MDA at small relative mandible mass. Notably, the location and abruptness of the performance transition differs among various kinematic performance metrics. Overall, this work contributes a novel approach to understanding form-function relationships in complex biomechanical systems. By using morphological data to calibrate a general biomechanical model for a particular group, it strikes a balance between simplicity and specificity and allows for conclusions that are uniquely tuned to the morphological characteristics of the group.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Integrative Organismal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.8%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.7%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
5
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
6
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.6%
9
Integrative and Comparative Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
10
European Biophysics Journal
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Theoretical Ecology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
15
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
19
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.6%