Body reconstruction and size estimation of plesiosaurs
Zhao, R. J.
Show abstract
Body size, especially body mass, is the key to understanding many biological properties. The scaling approaches and volumetric-density (VD) approaches are often employed to estimate the body masses of extinct amniotes. Precise skeletal reconstruction represents a pivotal step in all VD approaches, while the ribcage serves as one of the key determinants of thoracic shape and volume. Although being extensively investigated in physiological studies, the ribcage restoration remains poorly discussed during skeletal reconstruction. This study proposes one possible programme of skeletal reconstruction of extinct amniotes in 2D environments, focusing on the restoration of ribcage cross-sections. One recent VD approach, the cross-sectional method (CSM), was utilized to integrate the restored cross-sections into volume, therefore the workflow proposed here serves as a supplementary guideline of the application of the CSM in paleontology. Following this programme, a uniform set of reconstruction criteria was proposed for plesiosaurs, a clade of Mesozoic marine reptiles. Twenty-four plesiosaur models were created, then multiple regression models (Ordinary Least Squares, OLS; and Phylogenetically Generalized Least Squares, PGLS) based on them were employed to investigate the performance of various skeletal elements as size proxy. Despite the high disparity of their body plans, the trunk length and dimensions of dorsal vertebrae were found to be the most robost proxy for volume in plesiosaurs. The hybrid approach applied in this study, which incorporates VD estimates created under the same criteria as scaling samples, mitigates previous critiques focusing on inconsistent standards and inadequate taxonomic coverage. It allows fast and convenient body volume estimation for numerus individuals, even when only fragmentary fossil materials are available. The volumetric formulae for plesiosaurs can accommodate the size diversity of most taxa, except for some extremely giant pliosaurs, the largest of which might reach or exceed 20 metric tons in body mass. To demonstrate the utility of the formulae provided in this study, the body volumes of 113 plesiosaur taxa was estimated, and the branch-specific rates of size evolution computed from the data were mapped onto a plesiosaur phylogeny for visualization.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The balancing act of Nipponites mirabilis (Nostoceratidae, Ammonoidea): managing hydrostatics during a complex ontogenetic trajectory 96%
- Diving dinosaurs? Caveats on the use of bone compactness and pFDA for inferring lifestyle 96%
- The fast and the frugal: Divergent locomotory strategies drive limb lengthening in theropod dinosaurs 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidermal microstructures on the paired fins of marine sculpins suggest new functional hypotheses supporting benthic station-holding 93%
- Skull evolution and lineage diversification in endemic Malagasy carnivorans 92%
- Reliable reconstruction of cricket song from biophysical models and preserved specimens 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tongue bite apparatus highlights functional innovation in a 310-million-year-old ray-finned fish 95%
- The oldest peracarid crustacean reveals a Late Devonian freshwater colonisation by isopod relatives 93%
- Avian telencephalon and cerebellum volumes can be accurately estimated from digital brain endocasts 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Archaeological Bone Assemblages Trace Changes in Turtle and Tortoise Diversity in Continental Southeast Asia 93%
- A new tuna specimen (Genus Auxis) from the Duho Formation (Miocene) of South Korea 92%
- Spatio-temporal diversity of dietary preferences and stress sensibilities of early and middle Miocene Rhinocerotidae from Eurasia: impact of climate changes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.