A Multi-state Non-Markov Framework to Estimate Progression of Chronic Disease
Ding, M.; Chen, H.; Lin, F.-C.
Show abstract
In chronic disease epidemiology, the investigation of disease etiology has largely focused on one endpoint, and the progression of chronic disease as a multi-state process is understudied, representing a knowledge gap. Most existing multi-state regression models require Markov assumption and are unsuitable to describe the course of chronic disease progression that is largely non-memoryless. We propose a new non-Markov framework that allows past states to affect the transition rates of current states, and the key innovation is the conversion of a non-Markov to Markov process by conditioning on past disease history to divide disease states into substates. Specifically, we apply cause-specific Cox models, including past states as covariates, to obtain transition rates of substates, which were used to estimate transition probabilities using the discrete-time Aalen-Johansen estimator. In simulation study, the non-Markov model generated higher coverage rates of transition rates compared to Markov models, particularly for non-Markov process (By applying non-Markov and Markov models, coverage rates were 91% and 88% for Markov process with exponential distribution, 52% and 43% for Markov process with Weibull distribution, 92% and 49% for non-Markov process with exponential distribution, and 59% and 23% for non-Markov process with Weibull distribution). We applied our model to describe the course of coronary heart disease (CHD) progression, where CHD was modeled in healthy, at-risk, CHD, heart failure, and mortality states. In summary, the significance of our framework lies in the fact that transition parameters between disease sub-states may provide a more accurate description of disease course than Markov regression models and shed light on new mechanistic insight into chronic disease. Our method has the potential for wide application in chronic disease epidemiology.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analyses using multiple imputation need to consider missing data in auxiliary variables 91%
- A hypothetical intervention to reduce inequities in anxiety for Multiracial people: simulating an intervention on childhood adversity 90%
- The US Midlife Mortality Crisis Continues: Excess Cause-Specific Mortality During 2020 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 93%
- Walking pace optimizes conventional cardiovascular disease risk prediction models among vulnerable subpopulations: a prospective cohort study 92%
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of the Michigan Chronic Disease Simulation Model (MICROSIM) 94%
- Introducing riskCommunicator: an R package to obtain interpretable effect estimates for public health 94%
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Observed COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate Among the U.S. Population 90%
- COVID-19 Mortality in California Based on Death Certificates: Disproportionate Impacts Across Racial/Ethnic Groups and Nativity 89%
- Deprivation and Segregation in Ovarian cancer survival among African American Women: a mediated analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian Structural Time Series for Biomedical Sensor Data: A Flexible Modeling Framework for Evaluating Interventions 92%
- Modeling the Interplay of Sex Hormones in Cardiac Hypertrophic Signaling 90%
- PaIRKAT: A pathway integrated regression-based kernel association test with applications to metabolomics and COPD phenotypes 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.