Effects of ketamine and propofol on muscarinic plateau potentials in rat neocortical pyramidal cells
Fleiner, A. S.; Kolnier, D.; Hagger-Vaughan, N.; Raeder, J.; Storm, J. F.
Show abstract
Propofol and ketamine are widely used general anaesthetics, but have different effects on consciousness: propofol gives a deeply unconscious state, with little or no dream reports, whereas vivid dreams are often reported after ketamine anaesthesia. Ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, while propofol is a {gamma}-aminobutyric-acid (GABAA) agonist, but these mechanisms do not fully explain how these drugs alter consciousness. Most previous in vitro studies of cellular mechanisms of anaesthetics have used brain slices or neurons in a nearly "comatose" state, because no "arousing" neuromodulators were added. Here we tested mechanisms of anaesthetics in slices after adding the cholinergic agonist muscarine to partly mimic an "awake-like" state. Using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from layer 2/3 pyramidal cells (L2/3PCs) in rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) slices, we saw that muscarine induced long-lasting depolarizing plateau potentials (PPs) and spiking following brief depolarizing current injections. According to leading theories of consciousness and working memory, L2/3PCs and PPs are particularly important for these cognitive functions. After 2 hours of pre-incubation with ketamine or propofol, the muscarine-induced PPs were altered in different ways: 3 {micro}M propofol reduced the PPs and (significantly) spiking, whereas 20 {micro}M ketamine seemed to enhance PPs and spiking (non-significantly). Brief wash-in of these drug concentrations failed to induce such effects, probably due to insufficient equilibration by diffusion in the slices. In contrast, pre-incubation with 100 {micro}M ketamine suppressed the PPs and spiking. The different effects on PPs may be related to contrasting clinical effects: ketamine causing atypical anaesthesia with vivid, "psychedelic" dreaming while propofol causes less dreaming. However, high ketamine or propofol concentrations both suppressed PPs, suggesting possible connections between PPs, desynchronized activity, and consciousness. More experiments are needed to test these tentative conclusions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tumor necrosis factor-α modulates GABAergic and Dopaminergic neurons in the ventral periaqueductal gray of female mice. 95%
- Simulated ischemia in live cerebral slices is mimicked by opening the Na+/K+ pump: clues to the generation of spreading depolarization. 94%
- Glutamatergic Control Of A Pattern-Generating Central Nucleus In A Gymnotiform Fish 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transport-Related Effects on Intrinsic and Synaptic Properties of Human Cortical Neurons: A Comparative Study 95%
- Heterogeneity of synaptic NMDA receptor responses within individual lamina I pain processing neurons across sex in rats and humans 93%
- Synaptic communication within the microcircuits of pyramidal neurons and basket cells in the mouse prefrontal cortex 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Group II metabotropic glutamate receptors modulate sound evoked and spontaneous activity in the mouse inferior colliculus 95%
- Role of synaptic inhibition in the coupling of the respiratory rhythms that underlie eupnea and sigh behaviors 93%
- Dopamine D2 receptors modulate intrinsic properties and synaptic transmission of parvalbumin interneurons in the mouse primary motor cortex 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Propofol Anesthesia Concentration Rather Than Abrupt Behavioral Unresponsiveness Linearly Degrades Responses in the Rat Primary Auditory Cortex 94%
- The developmental changes in intrinsic and synaptic properties of prefrontal neurons enhance local network activity from the second to the third postnatal week 94%
- Social play behavior shapes the development of prefrontal inhibition in a region-specific manner 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.