Back

Genotype-specific expression of uncle fester suggests a role in allorecognition education in a basal chordate

Taketa, D. A.; Cengher, L.; Rodriguez, D.; Langenbacher, A. D.; De Tomaso, A. W.

2024-02-16 immunology
10.1101/2024.02.13.580188 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Histocompatibility is the ability to discriminate between self and non-self tissues, and has been described in species throughout the metazoa. Despite its universal presence, histocompatibility genes utilized by different phyla are unique-those found in sponges, cnidarians, ascidians and vertebrates are not orthologous. Thus, the origins of these sophisticated recognition systems, and any potential functional commonalities between them are not understood. A well-studied histocompatibility system exists in the botryllid ascidians, members of the chordate subphylum, Tunicata, and provides an opportunity to do so. Histocompatibility in the botryllids occurs at the tips of an extracorporeal vasculature that come into contact when two individuals grow into proximity. If compatible, the vessels will fuse, forming a parabiosis between the two individuals. If incompatible, the two vessels will reject-an inflammatory reaction that results in melanin scar formation at the point of contact, blocking anastomosis. Compatibility is determined by a single, highly polymorphic locus called the fuhc with the following rules: individuals that share one or both fuhc alleles will fuse, while those who share neither will reject. The fuhc locus encodes multiple proteins with roles in allorecognition, including one called uncle fester, which is necessary and sufficient to initiate the rejection response. Here we report the existence of genotype-specific expression levels of uncle fester, differing by up to 8-fold at the mRNA-level, and that these expression levels are constant and maintained for the lifetime of an individual. We also found that these differences had functional consequences: the expression level of uncle fester correlated with the speed and severity of the rejection response. These findings support previous conclusions that uncle fester levels modulate the rejection response, and may be responsible for controlling the variation observed in the timing and intensity of the reaction. The maintenance of genotype specific expression of uncle fester is also evidence of an education process reminiscent of that which occurs in mammalian Natural Killer (NK) cells. In turn, this suggests that while histocompatibility receptors and ligands evolve via convergent evolution, they may utilize conserved intracellular machinery to interpret binding events at the cell surface.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.5%
2
Developmental & Comparative Immunology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
8
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.6%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
15
EMBO Reports
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
17
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
22
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
24
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
29
Developmental Dynamics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%