Scaling Properties for Artificial Neural Network Models of a Small Nervous System
Simeon, Q.; Venancio, L. R.; Yang, G.; Boyden, E. S.; Nayebi, A.
Show abstract
The nematode worm C. elegans provides a unique opportunity for exploring in silico data-driven models of a whole nervous system, given its transparency and well-characterized nervous system facilitating a wealth of measurement data from wet-lab experiments. This study explores the scaling properties that may govern learning the underlying neural dynamics of this small nervous system by using artificial neural network (ANN) models. We investigate the accuracy of self-supervised next time-step neural activity prediction as a function of data and models. For data scaling, we report a monotonic log-linear reduction in mean-squared error (MSE) as a function of the amount of neural activity data. For model scaling, we find MSE to be a nonlinear function of the size of the ANN models. Furthermore, we observe that the dataset and model size scaling properties are influenced by the particular choice of model architecture but not by the precise experimental source of the C. elegans neural data. Our results fall short of producing long-horizon predictive and generative models of C. elegans whole nervous system dynamics but suggest directions to achieve those. In particular our data scaling properties extrapolate that recording more neural activity data is a fruitful near-term approach to obtaining better predictive ANN models of a small nervous system.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- PsychRNN: An Accessible and Flexible Python Package for Training Recurrent Neural Network Models on Cognitive Tasks 95%
- Spiking neural network models of sound localisation via a massively collaborative process 95%
- A Stochastic Dynamic Operator framework that improves the precision of analysis and prediction relative to the classical spike-triggered average method, extending the toolkit. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.