Back

Cell Size Controls Photosynthetic Capacity in a Mesoamerican and an Andean Genotype of Phaseolus vulgaris L.

Egesa, A. O.; Vallejos, C. E.; Begcy, K.

2024-02-15 physiology
10.1101/2024.02.13.580151 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The efficiency of CO2 flux in the leaf is hindered by a several structural and biochemical barriers which affect the overall net photosynthesis. However, the dearth of information about the genetic control of these features is limiting our ability for genetic manipulation. We performed a comparative analysis between a Mesoamerican and an Andean cultivar of Phaseolus vulgaris at variable light and CO2 levels. The Mesoamerican bean had higher photosynthetic rate, maximum rate of rubisco carboxylase activity and maximum rate of photosynthetic electron transport at light saturation conditions than its Andean counterpart. Leaf anatomy comparison between genotypes showed that the Mesoamerican bean had smaller cell sizes than the Andean bean. Smaller epidermal cells in the Mesoamerican bean resulted in higher stomata density and consequently higher stomatal conductance for water vapor and CO2 than in the Andean bean. Likewise, smaller palisade and spongy mesophyll cells in the Mesoamerican than in the Andean bean increased the cell surface area per unit of volume and consequently increased mesophyll conductance. Finally, smaller cells in the Mesoamerican also increased chlorophyll and protein concentration per unit of leaf area. In summary, we show that differential cell size controls the overall net photosynthesis and could be used as a target for genetic manipulation to improve photosynthesis. HighlightPhotosyntheUc performance comparison between a Mesoamerican and an Andean bean genotype showed higher rate at increased light and CO2 levels. Differences could be explained by variaUon in cell size.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.