Back

FakA impacts antiseptic susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis

Solsona Gaya, M.; Felgate, H.; Siani, H.; Whitchurch, C. B.; Webber, M. A.

2024-02-13 microbiology
10.1101/2024.02.13.580087 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biocides are widely used to control and prevent healthcare-associated infections and understanding how nosocomial pathogens respond to biocidal agents is key to improving infection prevention and control products and practices. An evolution model was used to study how Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis responded after repeated exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) and octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT) when grown planktonically and as biofilms. Both pathogens were able to adapt to grow at concentrations above the MIC of both biocides with planktonic lineages surviving at higher concentrations of both agents than biofilm lineages. Exposure to CHX was linked with lower biofilm biomass production in E. faecalis although biofilm biomass increased for S. aureus isolates after exposure to both agents. Evolved isolates had no major fitness deficit and only low-level changes to susceptibility to antibiotics were observed after biocide exposure. Sequencing of biocide adapted mutants repeatedly identified mutations within fakA encoding a fatty acid kinase in independent lineages of S. aureus after exposure to both biocides in all conditions. Analogous changes were observed within the homologous gene in parallel experiments with Enterococcus faecalis. Further assays to study the mechanistic basis and relationship to phospholipid production showed that evolved isolates with fakA mutations accumulated less ethidium bromide than parent strains, exhibited altered cell envelope morphology and decreased susceptibility to daptomycin. This data shows important pathogens can evolve limited tolerance to two common biocides but that this has collateral impacts on biofilm formation, colony morphology and fitness. FakA appears to play an important role in biocide tolerance.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
2
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
3
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
4
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.3%
5
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
6
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.4%
8
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
9
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
11
Biofilm
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
12
Microbial Biotechnology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
13
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
14
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.3%
15
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
16
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
18
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
19
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
20
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
21
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
22
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
23
FEMS Microbiology Letters
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
25
Molecular Microbiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
26
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
27
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
28
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
29
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
30
microLife
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%